CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202JUD004699815
2 décembre 2021
she had been deprived of. 26.
Page 13 sur 238
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD004897919
16 janvier 2024
The social workers facilitating the meeting wrote down the comments in a report and sent it to the family court to which the proceedings had been allocated.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148111
21 octobre 2014
She is represented before the Court by Mr T. Juričan, a lawyer practising in Varaždin.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0711JUD002850811
11 juillet 2019
Nor had he been provided with a copy of the record on the results of the examination of the signature sheets at least twenty-four hours prior to the ConEC meeting on his registration.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1013DEC001176285
13 octobre 1986
Among the documents of the case it appears from the minutes of a board meeting of 4 November 1982 that you have transferred your shares of SKAFTET KRAFTVERK AB (a limited liability company) to your
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0610DEC002779395
10 juin 2003
II Terms and Conditions of Share Subscription 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0122DEC004866299
22 janvier 2002
summer of 1945: shares in I.G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0615DEC002886395
15 juin 2000
On 23 May 1989 the shareholders of the company decided that the share capital would be increased to 25,000,000 million old zlotys (PLZ) and approved a private placement of a new issue of shares.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0212DEC001480789
12 février 1992
On 10 August 1983 the General Meeting of the Shareholders decided the winding up of the company and appointed a liquidator.
ECLI:CEDH:001-115518
28 novembre 2012
a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318JUD003103820
18 mars 2025
Since he was to become a holder of 96% of the company’s shares, in his takeover bid he undertook to pay to minority shareholders 16.50 Croatian kunas (HRK; approx. 2.20 euros (EUR)) per share.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12527
29 janvier 2019
authorities: case referred to the Grand Chamber The applicants, shareholders in two savings banks, alleged that the restriction of their rights to influence the operation of the banks in which they held shares
ECLI:CEDH:001-250335
30 avril 2026
The State thus failed to create a favourable environment for participation in public debate allowing them to receive and share information without fear. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
soc
6137226dcd580146773fce71
2 mars 1995
Didier Y..., demeurant route nationale n 4, station Shell à Void Vacon (Meuse), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 19 juin 1992 par la cour d'appel de Nancy (2e chambre civile), au profit de l'URSSAF de
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0331DEC001936592
31 mars 1993
This expert had refuted the necessity of a tool shed for the purpose of beekeeping and thus for agricultural purposes and in accordance with his opinion the authorities had correctly decided that the shed
ECLI:CEDH:001-128031
8 octobre 2013
She alleged, in particular, that it was unlawful to sell a share in a flat, which had not been allocated in kind, and that she, as a co-owner, had to be given an opportunity to exercise her right of pre-emption
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD001331208
10 octobre 2017
Turkey (no. 46815/09, §§ 45-51, 21 July 2015), where it concluded that the Demirbank shares purchased on the stock market had had an economic value and thus constituted possessions within the meaning
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0409DEC002377394
9 avril 1996
If a shore area forming part of a private property was completely or almost completely included in the shore conservation programme, the owner was nevertheless to be allowed to construct leisure houses
ECLI:CEDH:001-117038
7 février 2013
Other persons can be also recognised as tenant’s family members if they live with him and share housing tasks.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4082
22 décembre 2004
She and her parents therefore clearly formed a “family” within the meaning of Article 8 at that time.