CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2933331-3228315
16 novembre 2009
He graduated from the Institute of Political Studies in Paris, from the Faculty of Law in Paris and from the Ecole Nationale d’Administration .
Page 13 sur 79
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174473
23 mai 2017
The works continued thereafter and on 15 March 2004 the chief architect certified that the building was fit for operation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-145908
30 juin 2014
bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Communicated on 30 June 2014 FIRST SECTION Application no. 25536/14 Maja ŠKORJANEC against Croatia lodged on 20 March
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12748
3 mars 2020
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 238 March
civ3
613720b4cd580146773edb43
27 avril 1988
cassation annexés au présent arrêt ; La demanderesse au pourvoi incident, invoque à l'appui de son recours, les deux moyens de cassation annexés au présent arrêt ; LA COUR, en l'audience publique du 16 mars
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002854295
15 mai 1996
MARXER B.
ECLI:CEDH:001-187175
26 septembre 2018
On 8 March 2017 the applicants made individual applications before the Constitutional Court in respect of their complaints regarding their dismissals and the cancellation of their passports.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC003300103
5 janvier 2006
On 13 March 2002 the applicant filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court. On 7 October 2002 the Constitutional Court declined to deal with the complaint for lack of prospects of success.
3e Section - 2e Chambre
DTA_2022559_20230223
23 février 2023
de substitution n'est pas justifiée dès lors que ce marché n'est pas identique au marché initial et ne porte pas sur la même prestation que celle qui faisait l'objet de ce marché ; - le remboursement
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0518DEC006720801
18 mai 2004
The applicant's correspondence with the registry of the Court In a letter of 17 March 2003, the applicant alleged that he and certain lawyers had agreed that “the genocide of fundamental human rights in
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0701JUD002917895
1 juillet 2003
On or around 23 June 1999 charges were brought against William Stobie for the murder of Patrick Finucane and against Mark Barr, Paul Givens and William Hutchinson for offences of possession
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD002157508
17 janvier 2017
The prison thus considered that Internet access, or the lack thereof, had no impact on the quality of studies. 19 .
1ère Chambre
6316e501dd8d194f138d4da9
5 septembre 2022
--------------------------------- EXPOSÉ DU LITIGE Selon devis du 28 mai 2013 et signé le 5 juin 2013, Monsieur [G] [W] a confié à la société à responsabilité limitée (SARL) Karpate Import un marché
ECLI:CEDH:001-148587
13 novembre 2014
Furthermore, R.V. gave a negative opinion on the applicant’s objections to the manner of evaluation of his final mathematics exam, and eventually the applicant failed to enrol the desired university studies
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC003189305
20 octobre 2009
The final decision was taken by the Regional Court of The Hague’s on 7 March 2003.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-3098854-3431284
20 avril 2010
Non-violation de l’article 6 § 1 Kin-Stib and Majkić c.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128DEC006275919
28 novembre 2023
In particular, the Court of Appeal emphasised the public interest in the matter and the fact that the publication had been based on studies and tests carried out by credible bodies, albeit using different
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0213DEC001722990
13 février 1992
After his arrival he began to follow a computer studies course and on 25 October 1984 he applied for leave to remain in the United Kingdom.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC003614197
19 juin 2001
On 31 March 1997 the Court of Cassation rejected the applicant’s rectification request.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1102JUD001596902
2 novembre 2006
The following hearing was fixed for 26 March 2002. 15. On 27 March 2002 the Vorkuta Town Court ordered another expert examination.