En présence de : Monsieur Nicolas BELLET représentant le Ministère Public. Débats à l'audience en Chambre du Conseil du 06/01/2026.

On 4 February 1999 the Supreme Court rejected at first instance the applicant’s action whereby he had alleged that the presidential decree of 11 December 1998 had been null and void.

Dek, a lawyer practising in Białystok. A.     Particular circumstances of the case 1.

  Lithuania (dec.), no. 37193/97, 20 April 1999). The Court considers that the applicant’s widow has a legitimate interest to maintain the case in his stead. 2.

146.42pt; display:inline-block } .s100D1E5 { width:50.22pt; display:inline-block } .s2CF788F1 { width:132.09pt; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 18686/13 Nicolae

application des dispositions des articles 785 et 786 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 11 Février 2019, en audience publique, les avocats ne s'y étant pas opposés, devant Monsieur Nicolas

Moldova (dec.), no. 31413/03, 28   February 2006). Accordingly, the application must be rejected as being manifestly ill-founded, pursuant to Article 35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention.

Desjardins, conseiller, les observations de la SCP Nicolay et de Lanouvelle, avocat de Mlle X..., de Me Cossa, avocat de l'association Foyer de charité d'Alsace, les conclusions de M.

Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 41183/02, ECHR 2005-...).

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII.

  Poland (dec.), no.   10453/03, 22   November 2005).

  Slovakia (dec.), no.   18968/07, 16   June 2009, and I.G., M.K. and R.H. v.   Slovakia (dec.), no.   15966/04, 22 September 2009. COMPLAINTS 1.

  Poland (dec.) no.   11602/02, 26   June   2007; and Sulwińska v.   Poland (dec.) no.   28953/03).

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII.

Poland no. 15212/03 (dec.), §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland no. 11215/02 (dec.), ECHR 2005-VIII and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland , no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

    Law Decree no. 174/2012 amended Legislative Decree no.

Nicolas Dufaud, secrétaire général adjoint de la préfecture, revêtu de la signature manuscrite du préfet, il n'a pas soumis cette pièce au contradictoire et a dès lors méconnu les dispositions de l'article

Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§   12 ‑ 23, ECHR 2005-V and Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII, and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v.

  165 of 30 March 2001, as modified by Decree Law no. 262 of 3 October 2006 (the so-called “spoils system”, see paragraph   9 below). 4.