CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0224JUD000305204
24 février 2009
It then asked for access to the case-file and found no request from the Government’s Agent, who had not been a party to any of the domestic proceedings in 2003 and 2005. 18.
Page 13 sur 15
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0218JUD001231386
18 février 1991
On 25 April the Commission produced the file of the proceedings before it, as the Registrar had requested on the President's instructions. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1127JUD001232586
27 novembre 1991
On 29 June 1984 the investigating judge made an order closing the investigation of the main offence and forwarded the file to the prosecuting authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0302JUD000926781
2 mars 1987
be entitled to file a memorial in reply within two months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD007005510
27 février 2014
A first interview was held, after which the file was sent to the Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (“the Commissioner General”). 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:1123JUD000891980
23 novembre 1983
On 25 August, he directed that the Agent should have until 25 November to file a memorial and that the Delegates should be entitled to file a memorial in reply within two months from the date of the transmission
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109JUD003713806
9 novembre 2010
While the Court has duly examined the entire medical file, only the main and most relevant points are summarised below for information purposes. 50.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266
18 juin 1971
On 1st July 1970, the Secretary of the Commission informed the Registrar that the Delegates did not wish to file a rejoinder. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0408JUD003854497
8 avril 2004
September 2001 the President of the Third Section refused the applicants' request to include their observations in reply of 8 and 9 August and 3 September 2001, filed outside the time-limit, in the case file
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929JUD003007503
29 septembre 2020
The Court takes note of the parties’ submissions and finds that as it appears from the case file, the applicants have recovered full possession of parts of the claimed property in respect
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0608DEC001356488
8 juin 1990
Fundamental Freedoms; Having regard to the application introduced on 12 November 1987 by P.L. against Norway and registered on 28 January 1988 under file
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0306JUD004151098
6 mars 2003
No stamp duty is required to file such an action. 23. Under Article 372 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a court judgment which has come into force is binding and must be executed.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120700
22 octobre 2009
The Court should guard against slipping into playing the role of King Canute.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1022DEC006841601
22 octobre 2002
PET FOOD AND LITTER McDonald’s and Burger King are two of the many US corporations using lethal poisons to destroy vast areas of Central American rainforest to create grazing pastures for cattle to be
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0704JUD001151920
4 juillet 2023
The police anti-extremism unit watched those recordings on 27 August 2019, took screenshots of the applicant’s image, printed them out and stored them in the case file. 11 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0306JUD004527699
6 mars 2001
Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 King’s Bench Reports 223). 37. In the recent case of R. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1981:1105JUD000721575
5 novembre 1981
On 2 December 1980, he decided that the Agent should have until 3 March 1981 to file a memorial and that the Delegate should be entitled to file a memorial in reply within two months from the date of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001455389
26 mai 1993
However, on 28 October 1992, the Chamber decided that it should be regarded as part of the case file (Rule 37 para. 1 in fine).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0928JUD004491298
28 septembre 2004
The Regional Court therefore examined the criminal file concerning the case of the applicant’s father.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404DEC006394509
4 avril 2017
There is no evidence in the file that any of the applicants appealed against the judgment. 17. In October 2006 the occupants of the building, including all the applicants, were evicted.