Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218DEC003035406
18 décembre 2012
18 décembre 2012
This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.” 10.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC002678206
15 février 2011
15 février 2011
The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2617072-2869111
11 février 2009
11 février 2009
Complaints Both cases raise the issue of the compatibility of the obligation imposed on the applicants to leave their houses and restore the land to its original state, at their expense and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0902DEC000088007
2 septembre 2008
2 septembre 2008
, to give notice of this part of the application to the respondent Government.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0401DEC002790703
1 avril 2008
1 avril 2008
The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC006740510
11 décembre 2012
11 décembre 2012
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A. The circumstances of the case 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0325DEC000171404
25 mars 2008
25 mars 2008
The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice. A.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC006749912
30 septembre 2014
30 septembre 2014
On 29 January 2007 the court invited the applicants to amend their request to satisfy the requirements prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC003469205
8 décembre 2009
8 décembre 2009
The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Ms N. Nikolova and Ms S. Atanasova, of the Ministry of Justice.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC001976904
21 février 2012
21 février 2012
He is represented before the Court by Mr M.I. Gürkan, a lawyer practising in Muğla. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111DEC002411706
11 janvier 2011
11 janvier 2011
He is represented before the Court by Ms L. Vlčáková, a lawyer practising in Ostrava. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920DEC000733210
20 septembre 2011
20 septembre 2011
The relevant lawyers successfully challenged their appointments in view of their relationship to the case.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2976900-3279182
22 décembre 2009
22 décembre 2009
Complaints, procedure and composition of the Court The applicants alleged that the occupation of their land had infringed their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions, guaranteed by
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC005514800
3 février 2009
3 février 2009
The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mrs M. Dimova of the Ministry of Justice.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC001019706
7 décembre 2010
7 décembre 2010
This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.” The applicant made no comment on the Government’s declaration.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC006110908
10 mai 2011
10 mai 2011
The Swedish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs Gunilla Isaksson, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC000382004
2 décembre 2008
2 décembre 2008
This decision was served on the applicant on 24 September 2003.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930DEC000150905
30 septembre 2008
30 septembre 2008
of Court, to give notice of this part of the application to the respondent Government.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302DEC002766908
2 mars 2010
2 mars 2010
In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC005409108
29 septembre 2009
29 septembre 2009
by their offence the courts had failed to follow the Supreme Court’s case-law.
Source officiellePage 13 sur 127