Although the respondent State did not raise any objection as to the Court’s competence ratione personae, this issue calls for consideration ex officio by the Court (see Sejdić and Finci v

Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 2312/08 and 34179/08, § 81, ECHR 2013 (extracts), and Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos.   27996/06 and 34836/06, § 55, ECHR 2009).

    En revanche, même si l’État défendeur n’a pas soulevé d’objection quant à sa compétence ratione personae ( Sejdić et Finci c.

It is represented before the Court by Oberhofer, Fink & Lechner, lawyers practising in Innsbruck. A.

gérant domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 6] [Localité 8] Représentées par Me Jeanne BAECHLIN de la SCP Jeanne BAECHLIN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, Toque : L0034 Assistées par Me Alfred FINK

It thus introduces a general prohibition on discrimination (see Sejdić and Finci v.   Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 53, ECHR 2009).

  11676/04, ECHR 2004-VI; see also Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 54, ECHR 2009).

article 14, il doit y avoir une différence dans le traitement de personnes placées dans des situations analogues ou comparables (voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, voir, parmi beaucoup d’autres, Sejdić et Finci

  23755/07, § 70, ECHR 2016, Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos.   27996/06 and 34836/06, § 27, ECHR 2009).

the distinction in issue did not pursue a legitimate aim or that there was not a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised (see Sejdić and Finci

    Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 extends the scope of protection of Article   14 to “any right set forth by law”, introducing a general prohibition of discrimination (see Sejdić and Finci

siège social est : 3, rue Navalperal 28035 MADRID- Espagne - La société EXPLOTACIONES FORESTALES AGRICOLAS Y PECUARIAS ALAVESAS représentée par son représentant légal dont le siège social est : Finca

It thus introduces a general prohibition of discrimination ( Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 53, ECHR 2009). 40.

  43546/02, §   48, 22   January 2008; and Sejdić and Finci v.   Bosnia-Herzegovina [GC], nos.   27996/06 and   34836/06, §   39, ECHR   2009). 31.

Latvia [GC], no. 55707/00, § 81, ECHR 2009; and Sejdić and Finci v.   Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, § 42, ECHR 2009). 82 .

prohibits discrimination in the enjoyment of “the rights and freedoms set forth in [the] Convention”, Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 introduces a general prohibition of discrimination (see Sejdić and Finci

ethnicity (Moldovan) on an individual, a practice which I find per se contrary to the principle of self-identification which was not only accepted but further developed in the Grand Chamber's Sejdić and Finci

          The District Court found that the applicants had participated in a demonstration against nuclear armament in front of the Eberhard Finckh barracks at Engstingen

pursue a “legitimate aim” or that there is not a “reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised” (see, among many other authorities, Sejdić and Finci