CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0716JUD004349007
16 juillet 2015
The second applicant lastly complained that the court of appeal had denied him the right to study the case file.
Page 13 sur 25
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0520JUD003068505
20 mai 2010
Except for the second one in which she criticised the State Security Court system, the applicant submitted a detailed account of the ill-treatment she had been subjected to in police custody and denied
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0922JUD001547389
22 septembre 1993
Indeed, this was not denied by the police officers when they gave evidence before the Detmold Regional Court.
cr
PELLIER, en date du 7 mai 1998, qui, dans la procédure suiviec/Dominique Y
613725a0cd5801467741f51f
27 mai 1999
rural 66 actuellement rue de Provence, figurant au cadastre rénové de la commune de Sète, section BP n° 34 lieudit rue Provence, pour un are et quatre-vingt centiares et sous le n° 35 lieudit plan Edouard
61372640cd580146774241d1
6 décembre 2006
inexactes ; qu'en déclarant Marc Y... coupable de complicité d'abus de biens sociaux au seul motif d'avoir accepté de tenir la comptabilité des sociétés au sein desquelles Charles E..., André C..., Edouard
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0914DEC003322296
14 septembre 1999
In the Court's view the applicant's right to consult his solicitor in these circumstances cannot be said to have been denied or deliberately delayed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD003996609
15 mars 2016
The applicant alleged a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in that he had been denied an opportunity to proffer witness evidence. 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC001571716
4 juin 2024
D’Ascia; the observations submitted by the Government; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC004858007
29 juin 2010
as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Ms Patricia Curmi, Mr Bernard Pullicino, Ms Maryanne Zammit Pullicino, Ms Stephanie Mose' Pullicino, Mr Edward Pullicino, Ms Graziella Pullicino, Mr
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC004504998
11 septembre 2001
Edwards [1987] 1 WLR 1116 per Bingham LJ). In Reeves v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0928DEC003454203
28 septembre 2006
That Law provided for a sufficient remedy capable of redressing the Convention grievances of persons who were denied access to their possessions in their villages.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109DEC003874597
9 novembre 1999
Answering the only question put to him by his counsel, the applicant denied any involvement in N.S.’s murder.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616DEC002448813
16 juin 2015
The applicant was questioned on the same day and he denied having breached the public peace and order.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701JUD001007104
1 juillet 2008
He denied its veracity and submitted that its disclosure at trial would in no way have impaired any State secrets. 31.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114587
16 octobre 2012
He again denied involvement in the murder. Both of these conversations were recorded, as Mr Pearman, as a category A prisoner, would have known. 2.
REFERES
69deb1cccdc6046d473f6078
14 avril 2026
GUY-FAVIER ET : DEFENDERESSES SOCIETE AEI MULTISERVICES immatriculée au RCS de [Localité 2] sous le numéro 878 237 700, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 2] Défaillante et non représentée Maître Edouard
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0319JUD003003305
19 mars 2009
He also questioned Mr T. and another police officer, who denied beating the applicant or any of his relatives.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC002761895
18 janvier 2000
The first applicant denied having given any medicine or sleeping drugs to the victim, or having seen a third person at the apartment.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-580991-584603
2 juillet 2002
Nor could it be said that the applicant had been denied his rights under Article 6 § 3 (d) on the ground that he was unable to examine or have examined the evidence given by M. during the trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC004229008
15 mai 2012
De Gaetano, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 19 August 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS 1.