CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

828 résultats pour « Anaïs MEGNINT »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0428DEC002313424

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2026

28 avril 2026

CARATÃO PINTO against Portugal   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 28   April   2026 as a Committee composed of:   Anne Louise Bormann , President ,   Ana

Page 13 sur 42

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221299

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2022

28 octobre 2022

indifference in that respect, as well as their alleged failure to conduct effective investigations into the disappearances, been sufficiently serious to amount to inhuman and degrading treatment within the meaning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243807

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2025

19 mai 2025

  In particular, was an extraordinary appeal ( recurs în casație , contestație ȋn anulare, revizuire ) an effective remedy within the meaning of this provision in respect of the applicants’ complaints

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD000070222

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2023

8 juin 2023

Bosnia and Herzegovina, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke , President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins ,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326DEC003689423

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

against Portugal   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 26   March 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke, President ,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Ana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0309DEC001183085

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1989

9 mars 1989

  It further notes that there is no case-law supporting the argument that such claims cannot be considered as "loss of income" within the meaning of the Compensation Act.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3201131-3565374

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2010

13 juillet 2010

  The 11 applicants are: Mustafa Kurić, Ljubomir Petreš, Velimir Dabetić, and Ilfan Sadik Ademi, all stateless persons; Milan Makuc (now deceased [2] ), and Ana Mezga, both Croatian nationals; Jovan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0318DEC004106923

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2025

18 mars 2025

Miguel VALADARES E SOUSA against Portugal   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 18   March 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke , President ,   Ana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017DEC004516719

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

against Portugal   The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 17   October 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke, President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127DEC003489121

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2026

27 janvier 2026

Fourth Section), sitting on 27   January 2026 as a Chamber composed of:   Lado Chanturia , President ,   Jolien Schukking,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Anja Seibert-Fohr,   Ana

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0407JUD002596723

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2026

7 avril 2026

Georgia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Anja Seibert-Fohr , President ,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins,   András Jakab , judges ,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0623JUD002019315

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2022

23 juin 2022

Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Jolien Schukking, President,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0621JUD002859714

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2022

21 juin 2022

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0121DEC003602417

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2025

21 janvier 2025

No medical evidence of anal penetration by an organ or other object was observed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1210REP001422088

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 1992

10 décembre 1992

       Ej må nämndeman vid den domstol han tillhör föra annans      talan.        ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0929JUD003007503

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2020

29 septembre 2020

  9584/02 and 7 others, §§ 35-41, 29 April 2014) and to the applicants in the case of Ana Ionescu and Others v. Romania (19788/03, §§   6-7, 26   February 2019). 6.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-693010-700630

Admin. suprême

4 février 2003

4 février 2003

  Inmates were also strip-searched prior to open visits as well as visits to the clinic, hairdresser or dentist and subjected to strip search once a week, including an anal inspection, even where

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD007098111

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2023

12 janvier 2023

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0310DEC006453419

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2026

10 mars 2026

    The Government submitted that there was no “family life” between the applicant and Bashir within the meaning of Article   8 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1220JUD005328218

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2022

20 décembre 2022

    On 14 February 2017 the applicant asked the ANAF to revoke the decision of 3 February 2017, but on 10 March 2017 the employer denied her request. 10 .

Source officielle