AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
2ème chambre
DCA_22TL21498_20241126
26 novembre 2024
26 novembre 2024
Délibéré après l'audience du 12 novembre 2024, à laquelle siégeaient : - Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, - Mme Teuly-Desportes, présidente-assesseure, - Mme Bentolila, conseillère.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1480975-1548511
13 octobre 2005
13 octobre 2005
On 7 March 2002 Anişoara Mogoş and her daughter Dorina were arrested by the German police and were forcibly deported to Bucharest by air, under an agreement between the German and Romanian authorities
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0907DEC001951292
7 septembre 1993
7 septembre 1993
When appointing defense counsel, the national courts must certainly have regard to the defendant's wishes; indeed, German Law contemplates
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1121DEC002309220
21 novembre 2023
21 novembre 2023
Sommer, a lawyer practising in Köln; the decision to give notice of the application to the German Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr H.-J.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008DEC002198718
8 octobre 2024
8 octobre 2024
Eisele, a lawyer practising in Stuttgart; the decision to give notice of the application to the German Government (“the Government”), represented by one of their Agents, Mr H.-J.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC002154893
11 janvier 1994
11 janvier 1994
Procedure of the Commission; Having deliberated; Decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant is a German
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC001401102
24 octobre 2006
24 octobre 2006
of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Mariam Narchaovna Gazayeva (Marianna Keil), is a German
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1553320-1625764
11 janvier 2006
11 janvier 2006
Summary of the facts During the Second World War the applicant’s property was used by the German Army and then, in May 1945, by the Red Army.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2012802-2123362
25 mai 2007
25 mai 2007
On 13 July 2001 he was arrested by two UNMIK police officers (German).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1213DEC004323298
13 décembre 2001
13 décembre 2001
At the relevant time 1,000 convertible levs were the equivalent of about 2,000 German marks ("DEM"). The applicant’s former wife also requested the attachment of his bank accounts.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-106899
14 septembre 2011
14 septembre 2011
The judgment of the European Court has been sent out to the courts directly concerned and published in German, available via the website of the Federal Ministry of Justice ( www.bmj.de , Themen:
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-99637
3 juin 2010
3 juin 2010
General measures 1) Violation of Article 6§1 : The German authorities submitted that the violation resulted from the particular workload of the Federal Constitutional Court at the material
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0221DEC001164211
21 février 2017
21 février 2017
strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Aleksander Sokolow, is a German
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113594
10 septembre 2012
10 septembre 2012
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FOURTH SECTION Application no. 69720/11 Gernot KNOESS against Malta lodged on 2 November 2011 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Gernot Knoess, is a German
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12714
14 janvier 2020
14 janvier 2020
life Political interventions and procedural vagaries to impede court-ordered return of child unlawfully retained by other parent on respondent State’s territory: violation Facts – The applicants are a German
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12029
26 juillet 2018
26 juillet 2018
In determining whether the interference was “necessary in a democratic society”, the applicant could not claim contact rights under German civil law in force at that time because he was neither the child
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1215DEC000377168
15 décembre 1969
15 décembre 1969
normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } THE FACTS Whereas the facts presented by the applicant may be summarised as follows: The applicant is a German
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1019DEC001785191
19 octobre 1992
19 octobre 1992
Commission; Having deliberated; Decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant is a German
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC001543307
23 novembre 2010
23 novembre 2010
In the claim form, they assessed the monetary value of their claim at 6,000,000 “old dinars” (YUR - approximately 37,500 German marks (DEM) at the time) [1] .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC004653108
16 octobre 2012
16 octobre 2012
Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 11 September 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Franz Ludwig Weyhe, is a German
Source officiellePage 120 sur 339