CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

6 766 résultats pour « Geismann »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CAA

2ème chambre

DCA_22TL21498_20241126

Admin. Appel

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

Délibéré après l'audience du 12 novembre 2024, à laquelle siégeaient : - Mme Geslan-Demaret, présidente de chambre, - Mme Teuly-Desportes, présidente-assesseure, - Mme Bentolila, conseillère.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1480975-1548511

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2005

13 octobre 2005

  On 7 March 2002 Anişoara Mogoş and her daughter Dorina were arrested by the German police and were forcibly deported to Bucharest by air, under an agreement between the German and Romanian authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0907DEC001951292

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1993

7 septembre 1993

   When appointing defense counsel, the national courts must      certainly have regard to the defendant's wishes; indeed, German      Law contemplates

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1121DEC002309220

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2023

21 novembre 2023

Sommer, a lawyer practising in Köln; the decision to give notice of the application to the German Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr H.-J.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008DEC002198718

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2024

8 octobre 2024

Eisele, a lawyer practising in Stuttgart; the decision to give notice of the application to the German Government (“the Government”), represented by one of their Agents, Mr H.-J.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0111DEC002154893

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 1994

11 janvier 1994

Procedure of the Commission;        Having deliberated;        Decides as follows:   THE FACTS        The applicant is a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC001401102

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Ms Mariam Narchaovna Gazayeva (Marianna Keil), is a German

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1553320-1625764

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2006

11 janvier 2006

  Summary of the facts   During the Second World War the applicant’s property was used by the German Army and then, in May 1945, by the Red Army.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2012802-2123362

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2007

25 mai 2007

  On 13 July 2001 he was arrested by two UNMIK police officers (German).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1213DEC004323298

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2001

13 décembre 2001

At the relevant time 1,000 convertible levs were the equivalent of about 2,000 German marks ("DEM").   The applicant’s former wife also requested the attachment of his bank accounts.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-106899

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2011

14 septembre 2011

  The judgment of the European Court has been sent out to the courts directly concerned and published in German, available via the website of the Federal Ministry of Justice ( www.bmj.de , Themen:

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-99637

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2010

3 juin 2010

  General measures   1) Violation of Article 6§1 : The German authorities submitted that the violation resulted from the particular workload of the Federal Constitutional Court at the material

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0221DEC001164211

Admin. suprême

21 février 2017

21 février 2017

strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant, Mr Aleksander Sokolow, is a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113594

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2012

10 septembre 2012

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FOURTH SECTION Application no. 69720/11 Gernot KNOESS against Malta lodged on 2 November 2011 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Gernot Knoess, is a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12714

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

life Political interventions and procedural vagaries to impede court-ordered return of child unlawfully retained by other parent on respondent State’s territory: violation Facts – The applicants are a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12029

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2018

26 juillet 2018

In determining whether the interference was “necessary in a democratic society”, the applicant could not claim contact rights under German civil law in force at that time because he was neither the child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1215DEC000377168

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1969

15 décembre 1969

normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  THE FACTS   Whereas the facts presented by the applicant may be summarised as follows:   The applicant is a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1019DEC001785191

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1992

19 octobre 1992

Commission;         Having deliberated;         Decides as follows:   THE FACTS         The applicant is a German

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC001543307

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

  In the claim form, they assessed the monetary value of their claim at 6,000,000 “old dinars” (YUR - approximately 37,500 German marks (DEM) at the time) [1] .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC004653108

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 11 September 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Franz Ludwig Weyhe, is a German

Source officielle

Page 120 sur 339

← PrécédentSuivant →