Referring to Article 1070 of the Russian Civil Code, it noted that the State was only liable to compensation where a judge’s guilt had been established in a final criminal conviction.

Article 1070   §   1 of the Civil Code provided for compensation for unlawful criminal conviction or prosecution, the unlawful application of a preventive measure and an unlawful administrative

officials – for the damage sustained by an individual on account of, in particular, unlawful criminal prosecution or unlawful application of a preventive measure in the form of placement in custody (Article

Article 1070. Liability for damage caused by unlawful actions of agencies of inquiry and preliminary investigation, prosecutor’s offices and the courts “1.

    By Ruling no. 1-P of 25 January 2001, the Constitutional Court found that Article 1070 § 2 of the Civil Code was compatible with the Constitution in so far as it provided for special conditions

concernant les biens : Sur la prestation compensatoire : Sur la compétence du juge français et la loi applicable : Sur la compétence du juge français : Il résulte des dispositions de l'article

In accordance with Article 1070 of the Civil Code, a judge can only be held responsible for actions committed in the course of the administration of justice if he or she has been convicted of an abuse

L’absence de procédure ouverte en assistance éducative auprès du juge des enfants de Dunkerque a été vérifiée en application de l’article 1072-1 du code de procédure civile.

compensation for unlawful actions (or inaction) of State authorities and their officials Title II of the Civil Code stipulates specific rules for damage caused by law-enforcement authorities and the courts: Article

    The Civil Code of the Russian Federation provides as follows: Article 1070: Responsibility for damage caused by unlawful acts of investigating authorities, prosecuting authorities and courts

Relying on Articles 1069 and 1070 § 2 of the Civil Code (see paragraph 33 below) and Articles 55 and 56 of the CCP, the court concluded that the applicant had not adduced any evidence to show that any

    On 6 July 2004 the Kuntsevskiy District Court dismissed the applicant's claim, finding that Article 1070 of the Civil Code did not provide for State officials' liability for non-pecuniary

    Article 1070 § 1 of the Civil Code provides that the damage caused to an individual as a result of an unlawful conviction, unlawful institution of criminal proceedings, unlawful application

The applicable legislation, in particular Articles 1070 and 1071 of the Civil Code, provide that compensation for non-pecuniary damage in comparable situations is recoverable from the Ministry of Finance

Article 1070. Responsibility for Harm Caused by Illegal Actions of Agencies of Inquiry or Preliminary Investigation, Office of the Prosecutor, and Court. “1.

    Under Article 1070 § 1, damage caused to an individual as a result of an unlawful conviction, unlawful institution of criminal proceedings, unlawful application of a preventive measure in

Articles 1069 and 1070 of the Civil Code read as follows: Article 1069.

Relying on Articles 1070 and 1100 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Articles 133 and 134 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court held that the applicant had

    Mr Mityanin brought a civil claim under Article 1070 § 1 and Article   1100 of the Civil Code for compensation because there had been no valid court decision authorising his detention