2023   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application essentially concerns a judicial practice of the civil courts, in the context of urgent expropriation proceedings, to order the parties to pay a lump

October 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application essentially concerns a judicial practice of the civil courts, in the context of urgent expropriation proceedings, to order the parties to pay a lump

’habitat – 13 Habitat, à la société Chroma Finition Bâtiment, à la société d’assurance mutuelle Optim assurance, à la SAS EMC Menuiserie, à la SAS Méditerranée, à l’EURL Vaucluse Plomberie, à la SAS Lumy

Frédéric X..., demeurant ..., 08440 Lumes, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 15 mai 1996 par la cour d'appel de Reims (chambre sociale), au profit de M.

juge des référés, statuant sur le fondement des dispositions de l’article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative d’enjoindre au syndicat intercommunal des eaux et d’assainissement de la région de Lumbres

As from July 2007 the applicant was in receipt of the monthly payments in good time and on 24 September 2007 he received the awarded lump sum.

As from July 2007 the applicants were receiving the monthly payments in good time and on 24 September 2007 they received the awarded lump sums.

As from July 2007 the applicant was in receipt of the monthly payments in good time and on 24 September 2007 he received the awarded lump sum.

The applicant was also ordered to pay lump-sum court costs.

Moreover, he was paid a lump sum for the unpaid pensions, which was calculated on the basis of the new pension. 19.

The judgment debt consisted of a lump sum of 2,247   Georgian laris   (960 euros [1] ) and a monthly allowance of GEL 86.40   (EUR 38).

27 March 2003 17,419.61 8 July 2003 17 December 2004 4 March 2004 20,621.23 15 March 2004 23 November 2005 16 March 2004 4973.57 26 March 2004 9 November 2006 20 May 2004 5,972.29 monthly, 10,009.80 (lump

Thirdly, those who did not request reinstatement or placement in a stand-by post became entitled to lump sum compensation, equalling the amount of their one-year salary.

On 22 July 2005, complaining about a lump in his right testicle, the applicant applied to the infirmary of his regiment and stated that he was in a lot of pain.

Article 41 – EUR 330,000 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage (lump sum including pecuniary damage for loss of   investment and   profits as the proceedings   had exceeded the

    On 3   March 2009 the Commercial Court once again granted the applicant’s application for payment as a lump sum of the amounts of the monthly allowance.

transports, condamné Madame [Z] [H] à supporter l'intégralité de l'insuffisance d'actifs de la SAS Lub transports, condamné Madame [Z] [H] au paiement de la somme de 452.497,41 euros avec intérêts au

of the spine, dysfunction of the vertebral column, cerbical and lumbar osteochondrosis of the spine, dyscirculatory encephalopatny of the 1 st -2 nd degree with venous outflow impairment.

The lump sum of pension arrears was not paid. 16.