Following this, it forwarded the appeals to the County Administrative Court ( länsrätten ) of the County of Jönköping.

On 11 September 2001 the City Court extended the period of the investigation and the applicant’s detention to four months. On 17 September 2001 the Court of Appeal upheld this ruling.

In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the

their appeal on points of law on the ground that they had failed to assess the monetary value of their claim in the claim form.

It took the view that this was liable a priori to raise doubts in the applicants’ minds as to the impartiality of the Court of Cassation.

The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska.

They further requested the Court to strike out this part of the application in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.

Since 1994 the children are living with their mother in Germany.

For the sake of clarity, applicants will be referred as 1 st , 2 nd , 3 rd , 4 th and 5 th applicants in conformity with the appendix. 1.

  The full text of the Commission's opinion is reproduced as an annex to this judgment (1). _______________ 1.

    The parties’ arguments 28.     The Government disputed the admissibility of this complaint on the grounds that the applicants had abused their right of application.

During this period the CIPS received contributions paid by Mr Si Amer in due form.

The court held that the child’s removal from Israel without the father’s consent was wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

By a letter dated 16 February 2010, the Government informed the Court of their unilateral declaration, signed on the same date, with a view to resolving the issue raised by this complaint.

In this connection, they maintained that the domestic courts that had examined their case had failed to assess the facts of the case properly.

This error is clearly attributable to the authorities, not the applicants.

The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr Y. Zaytsev, of the Ministry of Justice.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr H.-J. Behrens, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

She was represented before the Court by Steen Petersen, a lawyer practising in Glostrup. The Danish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs Nina Holst-Christensen.