Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160720
22 janvier 2016
22 janvier 2016
In a decision of 28 April 2005 the Regional Court sent the case back to the High Prosecutor for additional investigation. On 15 December 2005 the High Court upheld this decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607DEC002201810
7 juin 2011
7 juin 2011
Considering that the High Court had erred in interpreting his appeal as a request for revocation, the applicant asked the High Court to correct the error in its decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122674
19 juin 2013
19 juin 2013
In a letter dated 7 April 2010 the Director of the Diyarbakır High Security Prison informed the applicant that his request was rejected on the grounds that the prison was a high security establishment,
Source officielle1ère Chambre
670e05dd10ea465c0ffcf768
9 avril 2024
9 avril 2024
instance entre les parties suivantes : Monsieur [B] [D] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] Représentant : Me Benjamin LEVY, avocat au barreau de BESANCON, avocat postulant Représentant : Me Catherine HIGY
Source officielle2e Chambre
6163515fa2ead9ed860b6ff3
25 mai 2011
25 mai 2011
Il a été convenu que la peinture serait refaite avec des produits [M] et appliqué par une autre société agrééé par la société [M] PERFORMANCE COATINGS FRANCE soit la société HIGH SPEC YACHTING.
Source officielleciv1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:C101052
24 septembre 2014
24 septembre 2014
commerce, en paiement de diverses sommes, les sociétés Ziegler France, Montgomery Transport SARL, Inko Trade, Jaroslav Mateja ; que la première a soulevé une exception de litispendance au profit de la High
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC005160099
28 février 2002
28 février 2002
Until the last judicial proceedings before the High Court referred to below, the applicant indicated that the husband’s detention and ill-treatment had occurred in 1991, but before the High Court she indicated
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0629DEC003209296
29 juin 2000
29 juin 2000
The applicant appealed immediately against the judgment to the High Court of Eastern Denmark ( Østre Landsret ) claiming acquittal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111612
24 mai 2012
24 mai 2012
Relevant domestic law Article 65 of Law no. 275/2006 provides inter alia that prisons organise primary, secondary and high-school classes.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224231
20 mars 2023
20 mars 2023
The applicants’ appeal on points of law filed with the High Court of Cassation and Justice and Justice was rejected as inadmissible on the ground that the value of the applicants’ claims was less than
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206187
20 octobre 2020
20 octobre 2020
A copy this letter was also sent by the advocates to the High Council of Justice.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141827
13 janvier 2011
13 janvier 2011
Under the high-security conditions the convicts have the right to two short-term visits a year (Article 125 § 3).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0909DEC001902891
9 septembre 1992
9 septembre 1992
He complains that his conviction by the High Court of Western Denmark cannot be reviewed by a higher tribunal and maintains that Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 should be interpreted so as to leave the choice
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0731JUD005038999
31 juillet 2003
31 juillet 2003
Le 10 mars 1992, la High Court prescrivit, avec l'accord des parties, la communication des pièces.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC004348322
4 juin 2024
4 juin 2024
On 6 May 2022 the Supreme Court refused the applicants leave to appeal against the High Court’s judgment. 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711DEC001110604
11 juillet 2006
11 juillet 2006
The High Court bases its judgment, as in the Borgarting High Court’s ruling of 28 June 2001 in the Orderud case (appeal case 01-02109) on the fact that when there is a convicting judgment, the qualified
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3666
18 octobre 2005
18 octobre 2005
.) - 6778/05 Decision 18.10.2005 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Higher Commercial Court’s refusal to admit cassation appeals which had not been filed in accordance
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2064
10 mai 2012
10 mai 2012
In September 2009, upon an application by the Prosecutor General, the High Court of Cassation and Justice (the High Court) laid down binding guidelines for the uniform interpretation of the legal provisions
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116751
25 janvier 2013
25 janvier 2013
The High Court pointed to the children’s later reactions, including that B had in 2008 been diagnosed as suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome.
Source officiellePôle 5 - Chambre 5
616348f5543823d76b03178a
26 mai 2011
26 mai 2011
PHARMA France SA ayant son siège : [Adresse 3] représentée par la SCP MIREILLE GARNIER, avoués à la Cour assistée de Me Eduard MARISSENS, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : G 340, Société HIGH
Source officiellePage 12 sur 1366