CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0302DEC007191601
2 mars 2005
1949 in the Soviet Occupied Zone of Germany following the land reform ( Bodenreform ) or after 1949 in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). 4.
Page 12 sur 630
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68360-68828
13 février 2001
Lietzow, a German national born in 1925 and living in Schwalbach; and, Jörg Schöps, a German national born in 1953 and living in Essen.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-914957-940791
29 janvier 2004
Germany Thursday 29 January 2004 at 9.30 a.m.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7302
8 novembre 2012
A reference to the Holocaust had to be seen in the specific context of the German past.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0713DEC001676690
13 juillet 1990
The Department noted that the applicants were German citizens and that they had last lived in the Federal Republic of Germany.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0119DEC004491198
19 janvier 1999
COMPLAINTS The applicants complain of the decision of the German authorities to expel them from Germany.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-118245
7 mars 2013
In any event, the applicant’s son will reach the age of eighteen on 31 March 2013 and then be considered adult under German law.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:1965:54
3 juin 1965
. # Waldemar Deutschmann contro Repubblica federale di Germania. # Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main - Germania. # Causa 10-65.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49415
3 février 1994
regard to the report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 19 July 1989 by Mr B. against Germany
ECLI:CEDH:001-49334
17 septembre 1992
report drawn up by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 23 September 1988 by Mrs Berta Maas against Germany
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0701DEC004690622
1 juillet 2025
Hauke Leif ENGELS 2003 German Überlingen 2. Amrei Lisann Paulina FEGER 2005 German Überlingen 3. Jonathan HECKERT 2002 German Weinstadt 4. Levin JAROSCH 2004 German Ingersheim 5.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0901JUD002134721
1 septembre 2022
Proceedings in Germany 13 .
ECLI:CEDH:002-6201
9 novembre 1999
in the GDR: inadmissible The applicant held judicial office in the Democratic Republic of Germany (GDR) for about twenty years.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210781
2 juin 2021
Those courts established: (a) that the children had been born in Croatia but had before their retention had habitual residence in Germany, (b) the applicant and the children’s mother had never married
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD001912402
15 février 2007
Germany , no. 59320/00, ECHR 2004 ‑ VI), issues related to the social law and family law as well as the restricted right of audience ( Singularzulassung ) before German Appeals Courts (see decision
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0404DEC002068020
4 avril 2023
H. and G. are German nationals. H. worked in the administration of L.M. Hospital at the time of M.’s admission. G. is a psychiatrist and practised at a hospital in Bielefeld, Germany.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11240
6 octobre 2016
The information (together with data relating to many other account holders domiciled in Germany for tax purposes) had been illegally copied by an employee of the bank and purchased by the German secret
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331DEC000480012
31 mars 2015
Germany [GC], no. 75529/01 , ECHR 2006-VI; Nold v. Germany , no. 27250/02 , 29 June 2006).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705DEC000185422
5 juillet 2022
Germany, nos. 397/07 and 2322/07, § 48, 13 January 2011).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105DEC005197608
5 janvier 2010
Wirges, a German national living in Hamburg, who is the managing director of the second applicant, the Quicknaut GmbH, a limited liability company possessing legal personality under German law.