CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

311 résultats pour « Elchinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD007435413

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2020

30 janvier 2020

Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Azerbaijani national, Mr Elchin

Page 12 sur 16

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CA

1ère Chambre

67ecc9c5dab039e415d932ca

Appel

1 avril 2025

1 avril 2025

[U] a été vu travaillant et aménageant un local au [Adresse 1] à [Localité 4] (38), notamment à l'aide d'un poste à souder, des élinges, nacelle/manitou, compresseur d'air ; - une attestation de chiffre

Source officielle
TCOM

Référés

69e9bffbcdc6046d47393ef6

Commerce

7 janvier 2025

7 janvier 2025

Please also see the paragraph immediately above that describes the consequences of your electing not to receive delivery of the notices and disclosures electronically from us.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126484

Admin. suprême

30 août 2013

30 août 2013

ConEC decision of 11/10/2010; CEC decision of 16/10/2010 Baku Court of Appeal judgment of 30/10/2010; Supreme Court decision of 05/11/2010 (sent to applicant on 10/11/2010)   36702/11 28/02/2011 Elchin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1207JUD000283822

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2023

7 décembre 2023

xa0; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000     5791/22 09/12/2021 Andrey Sergeyevich ELSHIN

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1222JUD002799606

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2009

22 décembre 2009

Serb delegates and delegates of the ‘others’ to the House of Peoples of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina shall not participate in the process of electing Bosniac and Croat delegates for the House

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0609JUD004193907

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2016

9 juin 2016

An international tribunal such as the European Court of Human Rights might perhaps decide that the constitutional arrangements for electing members of the Presidency violate rights under the European Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0620JUD002449221

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2023

20 juin 2023

If the procedure of electing candidates cannot be concluded in the first round, a three-fifths majority of the total number of members shall be required in the second round.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003156613

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

.: Why don’t you agree with the current system of electing the President of the Supreme Court of Justice (SCJ)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD003607304

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

    On 1 July 2002 the Administrative Court decided to maintain the position set out in its initial judgment, thus electing to disregard that adopted by the Fifth Division of the Supreme Administrative

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD001927308

Admin. suprême

25 février 2020

25 février 2020

    In the court’s view, the following part of “Russia guards its borders” contained calls not to vote for the United Russia party and described the consequences of electing its candidates: “

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:0208DEC000525871

Admin. suprême

8 février 1973

8 février 1973

On the other hand, it appears that the system, as such, of electing lay judges could not have been challenged and it is not clear whether the applicant could successfully have challenged any individual

Source officielle
CA

1ère Chambre

68f864fd5d3e42c22e13ba21

Appel

21 octobre 2025

21 octobre 2025

[P] [M] précité a communiqué à [D] [V] les courriers éléchangés avec [C] [X].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC004153498

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2005

15 novembre 2005

officer... (5) If he determines that the charge has been proved the commanding officer ... shall, before recording a finding that the charge has been proved, afford the accused the opportunity of electing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0729JUD003607906

Admin. suprême

29 juillet 2010

29 juillet 2010

under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Azerbaijani nationals, Mr Safarali Jafarli, Ms   Valida Baghirzade and Mr Elchin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC006437211

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

    The Danish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Tobias Elling Rehfeld, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and their Co-agent, Mrs Nina Holst-Christensen, from

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2638619-2883392

Admin. suprême

19 février 2009

19 février 2009

  The Court found no violation in respect of the Moroccan and French applicants, who had been detained for only short periods before electing to leave the United Kingdom.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0404DEC004408102

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2006

4 avril 2006

She alleged that the equality of voters in electing parliamentary representatives had not been respected.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC004251715

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2018

20 novembre 2018

The Danish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Tobias Elling Rehfeld, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and their Co-Agent, Ms Nina Holst-Christensen, from the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238001

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2024

12 novembre 2024

Türkiye 26/12/2022 Orhan BABER 1976 Osmaniye Turkish Elçin MERİÇ 159. 3683/23 Küçük v. Türkiye 10/01/2023 Murat KÜÇÜK 1969 Çorum Turkish Muhammet MARAŞLI 160. 3701/23 Tafracı v.

Source officielle