CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214418
23 novembre 2021
Turkey 22/09/2020 Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 5 43721/20 Akdağ v.
Page 12 sur 2399
ECLI:CEDH:001-187664
19 octobre 2018
Application no. 53848/09 also concerns the use of the evidence obtained under alleged duress during the preliminary investigation stage (see Özcan Çolak v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002138004
7 novembre 2013
During the trial the applicant was represented by a different lawyer.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130JUD000321919
30 novembre 2023
The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention. 8.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10904
24 mars 2016
(d) The first applicant’s placement in a metal cage during court hearings – According to the Court’s case-law, holding a person in a metal cage during a trial constituted in itself an affront
ECLI:CEDH:001-142511
18 mars 2014
during his police custody.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167282
15 septembre 2016
He was allegedly ill-treated by the police during the arrest.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155546
29 mai 2015
officers during the pre-trial investigation.
ECLI:CEDH:001-177246
30 août 2017
of Ms Taisa Artsuyeva, who was born in 1989 and died during the attack.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215JUD002827921
15 février 2024
The applicants complained principally under Article 3 of the Convention of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD000513619
11 janvier 2024
The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0201JUD002731519
1 février 2024
ECLI:CEDH:001-147131
16 septembre 2014
the right to visit the child during those proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0412JUD003480414
12 avril 2018
He maintained that he had not resisted arrest and that his injuries had been sustained not during his arrest but later on, during his stay in the police station.
ECLI:CEDH:001-220900
17 octobre 2022
Türkiye 09/06/2020 Lack of hearing during the detention review 31. 27850/20 Çakar v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-110642
16 mars 2012
The applicant fell faint several times during this interview. The applicant was kept in detention for a few days, during which he was constantly ill-treated.
ECLI:CEDH:001-142807
31 mars 2014
During his police custody, the applicant was allegedly ill-treated.
ECLI:CEDH:001-162383
30 mars 2016
He was called by telephone and in his telephone interview with the prosecutor he denied seeing any ill-treatment of the applicant during the arrest.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD004153918
of an effective remedy to complain about poor conditions of detention during transport; Gorlov and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-223751
2 mars 2023
APPENDIX – STATEMENT OF FACTS List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention (inadequate conditions of detention during transport) No. Application no.