Drobnjak, a lawyer practicing in Belgrade. A.

Panighel, - et les observations de Me Drobniak, substituant Me Jauvat, qui reprend le contenu des requêtes et soutient en outre que le préfet n'a pas pris en considération l'ensemble des critères énoncés

Slovakia , no. 67149/01, § 164, 24 March 2009, and Salontaji-Drobnjak v. Serbia , no. 36500/05, § 144, 13 October 2009). 36.

L’hirondel, - les observations de Me Drobniak, suppléant Me El Haik, représentant M.

Drobnjak, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr S. Carić. 3.

Municipal Court in Novi Pazar I. 964/04 of 29/10/2004 3,100 euros                    54103/08 13/10/2008 Dušica DROBNJAK

Drobac, a lawyer practising in Užice. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent at the time, Mr S. Carić. 3.

afforded to submit that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia , Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 117, ECHR   2005 ‑ X, and Salontaji-Drobnjak

Royaume-Uni [GC], n o 32555/96, § 117, CEDH 2005-X, et Salontaji-Drobnjak c. Serbie , n o 36500/05, § 132, 13   octobre 2009). 48.

Drobnjak, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr S. Carić. 3.

or restricted access to potable water, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light   1,300 -     589/24 07/12/2023 Vadym Leonidovych DROBA

It shall nevertheless, for reasons of context, also take into account any and all relevant events prior to that date (see, mutatis mutandis , Salontaji-Drobnjak v.

nevertheless, for reasons of context and whilst examining the applicant’s complaint as a whole, also take into account any and all relevant events prior to that date (see, mutatis mutandis , Salontaji-Drobnjak

  Drobnjak, a lawyer practicing in Belgrade. 2.     The Serbian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Ms N. Plavšić. A.     Relevant background 3.

ratification inasmuch as they could be considered to have created a continuous situation extending beyond that date or may be relevant for the understanding of facts occurring thereafter (see, Salontaji-Drobnjak

was afforded to submit that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see, inter alia , Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 117, ECHR 2005 ‑ X, and Salontaji-Drobnjak

Drobnič, a lawyer practising in Kranj. 2.     The Government were represented by their Agent, Ms T. Mihelič Žitko, State Attorney. 3.

Drobnjak, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr S. Carić. 3.

  32555/96, §   117, ECHR 2005 ‑ X, and Salontaji ‑ -Drobnjak v.   Serbia , no.   36500/05, §   132, 13   October 2009). 84.