CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224730

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2023

13 avril 2023

PARTIES Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case, purportedly pursuant to Article   5 of the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by that provision, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209591

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2021

31 mars 2021

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary to Article   10 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163513

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2016

12 mai 2016

  QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Would the applicant’s expulsion to Nigeria violate the applicant’s right to respect for his family life with his minor daughter, a German national, contrary to Article 8

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211637

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2021

15 juillet 2021

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141898

Admin. suprême

20 février 2014

20 février 2014

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains that the measures the authorities have been employing to hinder his and other protesters’ right to protest are contrary to Articles 3, 5, 8, 11 and 13 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-158679

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2015

19 octobre 2015

He claims that if expelled to Somalia, he will run a real and personal risk of treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-212642

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2021

27 septembre 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208380

Admin. suprême

3 février 2021

3 février 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in the light of the alleged protracted and ineffective enforcement

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206180

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2020

20 octobre 2020

    Has there been a violation of the second applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0605DEC006145215

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2018

5 juin 2018

The applicant complained that her minor daughter, who was born in the Netherlands, will be subjected to female genital mutilation (hereafter “FGM”), and thus treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196446

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2019

10 septembre 2019

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of association, contrary to Article   11 of the Convention?   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-606

Admin. suprême

8 février 2011

8 février 2011

In his application to the European Court, the applicant complained, inter alia , that the jury’s failure to provide reasons had deprived him of a fair trial, contrary to Article   6 of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-250183

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2026

23 avril 2026

    Did the applicant suffer discrimination on account of her type of employment as a teacher of a technical public school, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention linked with Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181006

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2018

25 janvier 2018

    Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention, on account of their conviction under Articles 220 § 7 and 314 of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243686

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2025

13 mai 2025

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention, by the decision not to appoint him to the post in question

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1024DEC003715317

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2019

24 octobre 2019

The applicant complained that she and her minor daughter, who was born in the Netherlands, would be subjected to (further) female genital mutilation (“FGM”), and thus treatment contrary to Article 3 of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49263

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 1986

16 septembre 1986

the censorship of their correspondence by the British prison authorities, and alleged breaches of Article 8 (art. 8) of the convention, Mr Jenkinson also complaining of a denial of access to court, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242514

Admin. suprême

27 février 2025

27 février 2025

The applicants complain that if they were to be removed to Greece, they would face treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention due to the living conditions and the lack of medical care there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234823

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2024

3 juin 2024

Thus, his deportation was found to be proportionate and not contrary to Article   8 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238255

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2024

28 octobre 2024

The applicant complains that the expulsion order of 10 June 2020 is enforceable and that a return to Syria, his country of origin, would expose him to the risk of being subjected to treatment contrary

Source officielle

Page 12 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →