facts, in which he argued that neither his former wife E.K. nor the applicant had been aware of the unlawful nature of his discussions with G.Sz., and that therefore they should be exonerated of any guilt

    In a letter dated 9 July 2001, addressed to the Bornova Criminal Court the first applicant confessed to his guilt. 13.

During this meeting all parties agreed to the sale of all of Atlas' assets, part of which was seized by the tax authorities, to Van Baarsen for a total amount of 500,000 Dutch guilders.

by which the applicant’s preventive detention had been ordered retrospectively, could not be considered as a “conviction” for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (a) as it did not contain a new finding of guilt

The prosecutor declared that the applicant’s guilt had been proved by the statements of the co-accused and by the recordings of the applicant’s phone conversations, the transcripts of which were available

The court rejected his request, stating that the proposed witness evidence would not affect its view of the applicant's guilt, its finding being based on completely different and more relevant facts.

It held that the applicant's guilt of acquisition of drugs for the purpose of sale and the sale of drugs had been confirmed by the evidence examined during the trial.

The fact that it was a long time before [M.] spoke about what he experienced is easily explained by the feelings of guilt he has had and by the fact that thinking about the incidents is distasteful to

[the applicant's and his co-accused brother's] possible guilt of the offence of dishonesty as a debtor ...

de la SELARLU ELISA GUEILHERS AVOCAT, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, toque 96 Copie exécutoire :Me Clément GAMBIN, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, toque 589, Me Pascale REGRETTIER-GERMAIN, avocat

       The applicant was sentenced to nine months' imprisonment, suspended pending a probation period of two years, and a fine of half a million Dutch guilders to be replaced by

respectivement, à compter du 30 août 2004 et du 1er septembre 2006, par la société Ecole des Roches, internat privé sous contrat avec l'Etat, en qualité de chefs de maison au sein de l'internat « La Guiche

During this meeting, while being observed by the Dutch police, H.M. handed 500.000 Dutch guilders over to "Hugo", after the applicant had given him a plastic bag out of which H.M. took the money.

    The Court reiterates that the word “conviction”, for the purposes of Article 5 § 1 (a), is to be understood as signifying both a finding of guilt, after it has been established in accordance

:   (Translation)         "Unless a provision of administrative law states otherwise,       negligent behaviour is sufficient to establish guilt

xa0;      (2)   that the judge in his summing-up went beyond justifiable         comment in expressing his own view of the applicant's guilt

It found that his guilt could be established on the basis of the evidence before it, i.e. the statements made by S.’s mother and the police officer as well as a psychological expert opinion on the question

In a letter dated 17 July 2002 the District Court judge informed the applicant that he had no right to file an appeal as regards the court’s finding as to the guilt of the accused police officer and as

In the latter case, a person who had never suffered from defects warranting placement in a psychiatric hospital could not be expected to undergo psychiatric treatment independently of his criminal guilt