CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC005160099
28 février 2002
Instead she stated that they had left Turkey in order to seek asylum in Norway.
Page 110 sur 1165
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1002JUD005304799
2 octobre 2007
The Kurdish problem exists in Turkey. Turks should also recognise this problem. Turkey is now at a critical point.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD000359803
16 avril 2013
Turkey (no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927DEC001231004
27 septembre 2005
On 13 March 1997 he left prison, at a time when the State no longer had control over prisons when Albania was reduced to turmoil.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2567991-2789796
2 décembre 2008
Turkey (no. 25471/02) The applicant, Ahmet Gemici, is a Turkish national who was born in 1952 and lives in İzmir (Turkey).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115JUD000659308
15 janvier 2019
Turkey , no. 31610/08, §§ 28-32, 29 November 2011; Şefik Demir v. Turkey (dec.), no. 51770/07, §§ 29-33, 16 October 2012; and Turgut and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1104DEC001412911
4 novembre 2014
Turkey (dec.), no. 57039/00, 31 January 2002; Saraç v. Turkey (dec.), no. 35841/97, 2 September 2004; Hıdır Durmaz v. Turkey , no. 55913/00, 5 December 2006, §§ 29-30; Pad and Others v.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-525377-526849
28 mars 2002
Turkey (no. 19660/92) EUR 18,400 (5) Mehmet Çelebi v. Turkey (no. 20140/92) EUR 7,750 EUR 1,100 (6) Adile Kartal v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110JUD001606490
10 janvier 2008
Turkey , judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ VI). 14.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12951
8 septembre 2020
Turkey (dec.) - 38197/16, 38384/16, 38389/16 et al.
ECLI:CEDH:003-445293-445994
8 novembre 2001
Turkey is final [1] : SECTION 2 (1) Laumont v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139131
15 novembre 2013
Those persons had served as human shields in south-east Turkey with a view to deterring the Turkish military forces from targeting members of the PKK.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219DEC001946608
19 décembre 2017
Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013). 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1205DEC002906106
5 décembre 2017
Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013). COMPLAINT 9.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230840
13 décembre 2023
Turkey (51962/12) and Deryan v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-240360
11 décembre 2024
Turkey (74552/01) and Türk v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619DEC003783310
19 juin 2012
The applicant’s lawyer was requested to comment and, if the applicant had indeed returned to Turkey, to provide the Court with his new contact details. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105DEC001375206
5 janvier 2010
Turkey , no. 28298/95, §§ 73-75, 20 April 2004; Ülkü Ekinci v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522JUD003045396
22 mai 2001
The applicants were represented by Mr Mehmet Nur Terzi, a lawyer practising in İzmir (Turkey).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0607JUD003598097
7 juin 2001
Çetinkaya, a lawyer practising in İzmir (Turkey). On 28 August 2000 one of the applicants, Mr U.Ş., was granted legal aid.