On 1 December 2004 the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay as the overall

B...doit être regardé comme demandant l'annulation des refus implicites du CSA d'exercer les actions prévues par les dispositions des articles 48-1, 48-3, 48-9 et 48-10 de la loi du 30 septembre 1986 en

    Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 37.

48-2 du règlement métropolitain de voirie, des articles L. 113-18 à L. 113-20 du code de la construction et de l'habitation et des articles 2.1.1 et 2.4 du règlement du plan local d'urbanisme métropolitain

Constitutional provisions and the Constitutional Court’s practice Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

Italy [1] , The Screening Panel of the European Court of Human Rights, constituted in accordance with Article 48 § 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the

par l’article 48 § 2 de la loi n o   3772/2009, au motif qu’elle séjournait en Grèce sans posséder les documents administratifs nécessaires.

48-2 du règlement métropolitain de voirie ; - le projet méconnaît l’article 15.3 des dispositions générales du plan local d'urbanisme métropolitain de la métropole Nice Côte d'Azur ; - le projet méconnaît

      Le présent rapport, établi conformément à l'ancien [1] article 30 § 2 de la Convention européenne des Droits de l'Homme, concerne la requête présentée par Djamel Lahouel contre la

26 February 1998, the first ‑ instance court had violated the applicant’s right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a   hearing without unjustified delay.

      Le présent rapport, établi conformément à l'ancien [1] article 30 § 2 de la Convention européenne des Droits de l'Homme, concerne la requête présentée par Aziza Dermouche contre la

Constitutional Court, after having appointed a legal-aid lawyer to represent the applicant in the constitutional proceedings, found that the Bratislava IV District Court had violated the applicant’s right under Article

time and his right under Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution to a hearing without unjustified delay.

In the meantime, on 2 May 2001, on the applicant’s petition ( podnet ) under Article 130 § 3 of the Constitution as then in force, the Constitutional Court found that the District Court had violated his

On 7 November 2006 the Supreme Court declared inadmissible the defendant’s appeal on points of law. 2.

    Article 48 § 2 provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 27.

    Article 48(2) of the Constitution provides, inter alia , that every person has the right to have his or her case tried without unjustified delay. 30.

The applicant invoked Article 48 § 2 of the Constitution with reference to the authorities’ failure to decide on his application for release and to procedural shortcomings in the proceedings at the preliminary