this agreement equitable within the meaning of Rule   75   §   4 of the Rules of Court and that it is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article

X... rapatrié d'Algérie ; qu'avant l'audience éventuelle de l'article 690 du Code de procédure civile, celui-ci a déposé un dire aux fins d'obtenir, par application des dispositions des articles 37

    The Court further notes that Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, in its relevant part, reads: “1.

    The Court further notes that Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, in its relevant part, reads: “1.

    The Court further notes that Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, in its relevant part, reads: “1.

    The Court   further notes that Article 37   §   1 of the Convention, in its relevant part, reads: “1.

    The Court further notes that Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, in its relevant part, reads: “1.

du code Civil et des articles 37 et 75 de la loi du 10 juillet 1991 relative à l’aide juridique, de : A titre principal, Débouter le SDC de sa demande de condamnation à la somme de 16.973,54€ majorée

ordonner une expertise médicale - et condamner la SA AXA FRANCE IARD à lui verser 2 897,83 euros à titre de provision à valoir sur l’indemnisation de son préjudice et 1 500 euros sur le fondement de l’article

    Since the question of the application of Article 41 of the Convention was not ready for decision, the Court reserved it and invited the Government and the applicant to submit, within six

terms, the Court finds the agreement equitable within the meaning of Rule 75 § 4 of the Rules of Court and that it is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article

    The case originated in an application (no. 36470/08) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (

    The Court held in that judgment that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention on account of inadequate conditions of detention.

    Accordingly, application no. 9770/19 (lodged by Ms Maria Cantemir) and application no. 9904/19 (lodged by Mr Vasile Halas) should be struck out of the list of cases in accordance with Article

    In the light of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article   37 §   1   (b) of the Convention and that respect for human

Radiation du rôle (Article 37-1-a - Absence d'intention de maintenir la requête)

Radiation du rôle (Article 37-1-a - Absence d'intention de maintenir la requête)

Radiation du rôle (Article 37-1-a - Absence d'intention de maintenir la requête)

Radiation du rôle (Article 37-1-a - Absence d'intention de maintenir la requête)