CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD006036710
29 janvier 2013
I accept that it may have been impractical for him to make a separate application for asylum en route. It is likely that he would have been under the control of the agent. 105.
Page 11 sur 13
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0511DEC001711690
11 mai 1992
Thus, between 21 and 23 November 1983 the applicant showed the film "New York City", lasting 120 minutes and consisting almost exclusively of sexual acts.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC005358609
4 mai 2010
Underhill House was owned and managed by Wolverhampton City Council (“the Council”), acting under its duties pursuant to the National Assistance Act 1948 and the NHS and Community Care Act 1990 (see paragraphs
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0111JUD006280709
11 janvier 2024
On 20/03/2014 the Leninskiy District Court examined the applicant’s complaint that the head of the Orenburg regional investigative committee had failed to act in response to his complaint of 09/
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1019JUD003255596
19 octobre 2005
Certificate under section 10 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 (“the 1947 Act”) 38. The applicant consulted solicitors in 1994 and obtained legal aid for proceedings.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0526JUD001696990
26 mai 1994
Keegan engagea par la suite une instance devant la Circuit Court en vue d’être nommé tuteur en vertu de l’article 6A par. 1 de la loi de 1964 sur la tutelle des mineurs (Guardianship of Infants Act 1964
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD003577811
26 juillet 2018
The District Court had, at the applicant’s request, authorised Mr Arif – at that time still a law student – to act as defence counsel under Article 138 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0117DEC002564694
17 janvier 1996
Those in Beaumont insisted that <the patient> be taken off the ventilator when he arrived, an extraordinary and shocking act given his serious head
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203JUD001365206
3 décembre 2009
However, the court noted that, due to the fact that a substantial amount of construction had been carried out on the site, it was impracticable to demolish the buildings constructed by Ruslan.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0630REP001483089
30 juin 1992
On 4 February 1986 the applicant was convicted of an offence under the Theft Act 1968 (Abstracting electricity - fined £100).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0513DEC001105884
13 mai 1986
The requirement of a pre-trial inquiry in circumstances such as the present case would be impractical, and open to abuse by unscrupulous and dishonest accused persons.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD001051110
10 décembre 2013
As of 10 October 2010, however, the Netherlands Antilles as such ceased to exist by virtue of the Kingdom Act of 7 September 2010 amending the Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0626DEC003322196
26 juin 2001
It would introduce a risk that prosecutors would act so as to protect themselves from claims of negligence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1218JUD001421210
18 décembre 2014
He was a member of the motorbike club “MC Bandidos, Chapter Kaiserslautern”, which was well-organised worldwide and known for violent, ruthless acts against persons considered as traitors.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0325JUD001711690
25 mars 1994
From 21 to 23 November 1983 nine people saw the film New York City, which lasted two hours and was made up almost exclusively of sexual acts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205JUD004317410
5 février 2013
The burden of proof as to the lawfulness of the contested decision, act or omission lies with the authority or official concerned.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0213DEC001322887
13 février 1990
The care proceedings under Section 1(2)a of the Children and Young Persons Act 1969 were heard by the Juvenile Court on 21 December 1982.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212JUD000225712
12 décembre 2017
When discharged from hospital in November 2010, the symptoms of withdrawal syndrome had receded and there were no signs of acute psychiatric disorders. 15 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605JUD006240010
5 juin 2012
The applicant considered that it was impracticable in such circumstances to appeal against the detention order of 7 May 2010. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD003129511
16 janvier 2020
The applicant was subsequently charged with murder (count 1), burglary (count 2), theft (count 3), handling stolen goods (count 4) and two specific acts of fraud (counts 5 and 6).