THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

put an end to the serious problem of excessive length of proceedings, so as to prevent new violations similar to those already found in the above-mentioned cases (see Resolutions DH (97) 336, DH (99)

rise to this application, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay it the amounts detailed in the appended table.

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention concerning his right to have access to a court were communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”).

Subsequently, in Vlad , cited above, §§ 24-32, the Court considered it appropriate to apply an exception to the general principle that the effectiveness of a given remedy was to be assessed with reference

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.

, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay her the amount detailed in the appended table.

  6969/19, the applicant company also complained about the inability to obtain damages for loss of profit due to the impossibility to build on its land.

The applicant’s complaint under Article 8 of the Convention concerning the decision to terminate her parental authority ( ouderlijke macht ) over her son were communicated to the Dutch Government (“the

The applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lack of access to court owing to the rejection of her request to be exempted from paying costs and expenses before the Court

conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application.

By letter dated 16 January 2025, sent by email, the applicant was invited to submit, by 9 April 2025, written observations in reply to those of the Government, and to appoint a legal representative.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the alleged failure to inform the applicant of insolvency proceedings to which he had been a party were communicated to the Austrian

applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table.