CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1110JUD004045407
10 novembre 2015
For its part, the LCI channel published an article headlined “ Albert : la rumeur d’un fils ” (“Albert: rumours about a son”) on its Internet site.
Page 11 sur 15
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD001490204
31 juillet 2014
The Court ruled that the penalties were unlawful as such, and did not represent an irregularity of a merely procedural nature (see, by contrast, Former King of Greece and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD004173810
17 avril 2014
According to the information in the file those proceedings are still pending (see paragraph 34 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0923JUD000715175
23 septembre 1982
On 8 May, he decided that the Agent should have until 8 August 1981 to file a memorial and that the Delegates should be entitled to file a memorial in reply within two months from the date of the transmission
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC003432596
20 mai 1998
MENS-HOEK against the Netherlands and registered on 20 December 1996 under file No. 34325/96; Having regard to the report provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0307DEC001366988
7 mars 1990
S. against the United Kingdom and registered on 16 March 1988 under file No. 13669/88; Having regard to the reports provided for in Rule 40 of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0602JUD007778501
2 juin 2005
They could not, however, file a joint declaration establishing the child's paternity because Mr G. had been placed in a detention facility on 20 June 1997.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0511DEC003503697
11 mai 2000
Articles 10, 11 and 15 of the Treaty of 11 January 1932 concluded by the President of the Republic of Poland and His Majesty the King of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002528994
18 janvier 2001
En janvier 1993, le requérant fit appel de la mise en demeure. Le ministre de l’Environnement désigna un inspecteur pour examiner le recours. 17.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0219JUD002162793
19 février 1997
Donovan (King’s Bench Reports 1934, vol. 2, p. 498), l’accusé avait frappé une jeune fille consentante avec une canne à des fins de jouissance sexuelle.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110JUD005239199
10 novembre 2005
Ms Boujedaine worked as chief cashier at a Burger King restaurant located on the Leidseplein in Amsterdam.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0518DEC002897295
18 mai 1999
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Having regard to the application introduced on 6 December 1990 by Erik Ninn ‑ Hansen against Denmark and registered on 25 October 1995 under file
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC002266910
14 février 2012
In the event that a sufficient amount had not been paid when a request for a judicial order had been made, the court was to fix a brief time-limit for payment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1030JUD001200586
30 octobre 1991
The procureur général’s department may file an appeal on a point of law either "in the interests of the law" (Articles 1089 and 1090 of the Judicial Code and Article 442 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0625JUD002012292
25 juin 1997
On 19 August 1987 the INAMI sent the file to the Limburg Provincial Council of the Ordre des médecins (Medical Association), annexing complaints by three of the applicant's
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0829JUD001170185
29 août 1990
Public Administration Act on the part of the Ministry: it had not specified the facts on which its decision to detain him again was based; it had refused him access to relevant documents in the case file
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0303DEC005239199
3 mars 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0504JUD002888395
4 mai 2001
Son fils Jonathan McKerr (« le requérant ») a maintenu la requête. 2. Le requérant, qui a été admis au bénéfice de l'assistance judiciaire, est représenté par M es K.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD004290898
14 juin 2007
The Government did not file a reply. THE LAW 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313JUD003981806
13 mars 2012
In this regard, the Court observes that when lodging its application under Article 250 of the Code of Civil Procedure the bank relied on evidence which was already in the domestic case file