relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin

Their submissions in that respect were similar to those made in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 46-48, 20 September 2016).

LYON INTIMEE : La CAISSE REGIONALE DE CREDIT AGRICOLE MUTUEL LOIRE HAUTE-LOIRE 94, rue Bergson 42007 SAINT ETIENNE représentée par la SCP BRONDEL-TUDELA, avoués à la Cour assistée de Me KAEPPELIN

prosecutor had amended his appeal and thereby had in substance dropped that charge, were those courts independent and impartial, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Karelin

    In the leading case of Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

Des amis de Djamila Y...prétendent que son mari ne voulait pas de l'enfant (cf : témoignages de Parixath B..., Betsy C..., Katelin D...), ce qui est contredit par la gynécologue de Djamila Y...et par une

    In the leading case of Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v.

relating to lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of the prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Karelin

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

    The relevant principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the requirement of impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention can be found in the leading case of Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

    In the leading case of Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Navalnyy and Yashin (cited above, §§ 82-85 and §§   91-98); Karelin

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v.

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v.

courts which dealt with the applicants’ cases impartial, as required by Article   6   §   1 of the Convention, on account of the absence of the prosecuting party from the proceedings (see Karelin