The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   Yuriy Zaytsev.

He is represented before the Court by Mr D. Kucera, a lawyer practising in Brno. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, from the Ministry of Justice.

Thus, at the time when the interference with the applicants’ right to respect for their home occurred, they were living in the flat in question.

He is represented before the Court by Mr A.L. Lesovoy, a lawyer practising in Simferopol. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr Yu Zaytsev.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 29 May 2008 the Court communicated the application to the respondent Government which submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits of the application on 2 September 2008.

She is represented before the Court by Mr A. V. Lesovoy, a lawyer practising in Simferopol. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr I. Zaytsev.

    The first applicant in this case is the mother, the second applicant is the wife and the third applicant is a brother of Akhamdi Isayev, born in 1981.

The choice as to the most appropriate means of achieving this is in principle a matter for the domestic authorities, who are in continuous contact with events and issues in their countries, and are better

This decision is contestable only if it is contrary to mandatory rules. The value of the claim is the basis for the court costs and the lawyer’s fees. COMPLAINTS 19.

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

Its section 5, as enacted, provided that in the performance of their duties the officials of the Ministry of the Interior were to “represent society as a whole”.

    In the present case, the Court notes that the applicants’ complaint concerns the dismissal by the domestic authorities of their additional compensation claims for the death of their relative

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R. Lazareska Gerovska.

In its view, this amount would constitute adequate redress and sufficient compensation for the impugned length of the said proceedings, and thus a reasonable sum as to quantum in the present case in the

The applicants’ omissions thus resulted in the decision of the Zagreb Municipal Court that their civil action was to be considered withdrawn.

the Court, to give notice of this part of the application to the respondent Government.

The exercise of this right, including the grounds on which it may be exercised, shall be governed by law. 2.