On 21 March 2008 the higher qualifications and disciplinary committee of the Bar Association (“the higher Bar committee”) quashed the above-mentioned decision and adopted a new one – that of annulling

    On 6 October 1997 the trustee, on behalf of the bankrupt HOP no. 49 , initiated civil proceedings before the High Court of Eastern Denmark ( Østre Landsret ), the High Court, against the

On 30 August 1991 the High Court decided in accordance with the State Prosecutor’s request.   The hearing in the High Court was scheduled to take place on 9 December 1991.

It appears that the applicant’s rectified appeal finally reached the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine, which on 10 November 2005 refused to examine it as submitted too late.

  2547 on Higher Education, which provided that expelled students could not enrol at another higher education institution.

    Within the framework of the 2010-2011 court reform (see paragraph   17 below) the High Court for Civil and Criminal Matters (“the High Court”) replaced the Supreme Court as the court

    The applicant appealed against the High Court’s judgment to the Supreme Court ( Høyesterett ) on the grounds that the High Court had erred in its assessment of evidence and that the facts

The High Court acknowledged that it was a penal institution.

    Secondly, the High Court noted that in the case of Grässer v.

Court judgment of 25 March 2015 the applicant, who suffers from schizophrenia, was placed in a high security psychiatric facility ( Sikringsafdelingen ).

SARL YES HIGH TECH [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentant : Me Chloé GILLIARD, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE APPELANT Monsieur [J] [V] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] Représentant : Me Jean-baptiste

O R D O N N E : Article 1er : La requête de la société high tech maintenance est rejetée comme portée devant un ordre de juridiction incompétent pour en connaître.

   Etant donné qu’un recours devant la High Court au titre de l’article   289 par. 1 porte sur un point de droit, la High Court n’a pas le pouvoir de recevoir des preuves complémentaires

The High Court therefore increased the frequency of contact sessions.

DÉFENDERESSE : La société HIGH TECH COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, société à responsabilité limitée immatriculée au Registre du Commerce et des Sociétés de PARIS sous le numéro 430 490 284 dont le siège social

The High Court refused the request.

Vu la procédure suivante :   Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 3 octobre 2022 et 7 juin 2023, ce dernier n’ayant pas été communiqué, la société anonyme (SA) Concurrent High Performance Solution

(a)     Can a list of three candidates, nominated by a High Contracting Party for election as a judge to the European Court of Human Rights in respect of the High Contracting Party and submitted

TRIBUNAL DES ACTIVITES ECONOMIQUES DE NANTERRE JUGEMENT DU 15 avril 2026 8ème Chambre N° PCL : 2016J00256 SAS GREEN HIGH TECH ENERGY CORP étendue à la SARL GROUPE NOVODIFF N° RG : 2026L00766 Par jugement