AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0203DEC000013710
3 février 2015
3 février 2015
On 28 August 2013 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC004125104
8 décembre 2015
8 décembre 2015
On 1 September 2006 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaint detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330DEC005826710
30 mars 2021
30 mars 2021
Although Article 6 § 1 obliges courts to give reasons for their decisions, it cannot be understood as requiring a detailed answer to every argument.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0701DEC007008401
1 juillet 2003
1 juillet 2003
They further complain under the same heading that they did not have the opportunity to request the rectification of the judgment, as there was no detailed reasoning in the Court of Cassation’s decision
Source officiellecr
6079a86d9ba5988459c4d38e
26 février 2002
26 février 2002
l'état défectueux des flexibles utilisés mais aussi à l'intervention d'un tiers qui, après travaux d'entretien, avait omis de replacer en mode de fonctionnement automatique la pompe de relevage du déshuileur
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0505JUD000664205
5 mai 2011
5 mai 2011
Detailed information may be provided upon request of the trial judge.” 11. On 8 June 2004 the Gagarinskiy District Court delivered judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9144
10 juin 1996
10 juin 1996
no means clear that objective observer would conclude that juror more inclined to believe prosecution witness - in addition, tribunal offered important safeguards such as random selection of jury, detailed
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC002458307
25 janvier 2011
25 janvier 2011
On 26 August 2009 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0921DEC001245907
21 septembre 2010
21 septembre 2010
On 18 September 2009 the Court decided to give notice to the Government under Rule 54 § 2 (a) of the Rules of Court of the applicant's complaints detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC000545105
9 novembre 2010
9 novembre 2010
On 21 October 2009 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC005954214
10 octobre 2017
10 octobre 2017
On 26 January 2017 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicants’ complaints detailed above and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC000603811
13 septembre 2016
13 septembre 2016
On 11 June 2013 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant company’s complaints as detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109DEC005314313
9 janvier 2018
9 janvier 2018
The applicant’s complaints detailed above were communicated to the Government. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC001667706
11 octobre 2011
11 octobre 2011
On 4 December 2009 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111610
23 mai 2012
23 mai 2012
that the proceedings were not fair because he had not been summoned for the hearing before the Supreme Court of Justice and because in reversing the first two judgments the Supreme Court did not give detailed
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916DEC000339608
16 septembre 2014
16 septembre 2014
On 6 May 2013 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaints detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1212DEC004448415
12 décembre 2017
12 décembre 2017
On 7 September 2017 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206DEC006519116
6 février 2018
6 février 2018
On 26 June 2017 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant’s complaint detailed above. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238476
14 novembre 2024
14 novembre 2024
Eventually, in 2020 the shop’s owner obtained an amendment of the detailed urban development plan, permitting the shop’s work.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231284
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
The parties are requested to submit a detailed summary in English or French of the impugned publications, as well as translations into English or French of the specific extracts of the impugned
Source officiellePage 11 sur 568