CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235233
25 juin 2024
return of the child.”
Page 11 sur 385
ECLI:CEDH:001-170269
12 décembre 2016
child protection authority or by a court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC005943510
10 décembre 2013
The father of the child was given a restraining order not to approach the applicant. His paternity of the child was confirmed in December 2007. 6.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14535
6 novembre 2025
The applicant had also sufficiently demonstrated his interest in the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-140217
18 décembre 2013
State where the child is, a period of less than one year has elapsed from the date of the wrongful removal or retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child forthwith.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155553
26 mai 2015
In November 2006 X gave birth to a daughter (hereafter “the child”). The applicant repeatedly requested access to the child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11705
22 juin 2017
Finally, in August 2016 the first-instance court ordered that the child be returned to her birth family. The child was returned in September 2016, an experience that she found very difficult.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9245
26 novembre 2013
The Australian courts decided that T. and the applicant had joint custody of the child and that the case would be further reviewed once the child was returned to Australia.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7611
18 juin 2013
Law – Article 8: The decision to place the child in a home and the subsequent decisions to withdraw the applicant’s contact rights completely and permanently and to transfer the child to another home had
4ème chambre
DTA_2005165_20230707
7 juillet 2023
Par des pièces enregistrées le 19 avril 2023, la commune de Chailly-en-Brie a notifié à ce tribunal l'arrêté du 4 avril 2023 par lequel le maire de Chailly-en-Brie a délivré à M.
Tribunal Administratif d'Orléans
ORTA_2404518_20250623
23 juin 2025
cet arrêté et d'enjoindre au maire de la commune de Chailly-en-Gâtinais de retirer l'arrêté n° PC 045 066 22 L0012 T02 du 9 novembre 2023 ; 3°) de mettre à la charge solidaire de la commune de Chailly-en-Gâtinais
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0208DEC001694490
8 février 1993
parent and his child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6420
10 juillet 2012
on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1028JUD002472017
28 octobre 2021
The child welfare services conducted a case study and concluded that the child was being brought up in a healthy environment and was developing well.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0513DEC001252386
13 mai 1987
The applicant states that he received no notice of this order until 5 December 1981 when he went round to where the mother and child were living and was denied access to the child.
1ère chambre
DCA_20PA02614_20220602
2 juin 2022
B C, ont demandé au tribunal administratif de Melun d'annuler la décision du 26 juillet 2018 par laquelle le maire de Chailly-en-Bière ne s'est pas opposé à la déclaration préalable de M.
ECLI:CEDH:001-209979
16 avril 2021
, in so far as father and child had been reunited.
ECLI:CEDH:001-159658
1 décembre 2015
It was decided that she should stay for three months at Vilde M ødrehjem , a parent/child institution, after the child was born so that it would be possible to evaluate her ability to give the child adequate
ECLI:CEDH:002-10896
1 mars 2016
Under that provision, a State is not bound to order the return of a child if it is established that there is a grave risk that the child would be exposed to psychological harm or otherwise placed in an
5ème chambre
DTA_2400412_20260409
9 avril 2026
A..., titulaire du grade d’adjoint technique principal de 2e classe, a été recruté par la commune de Chailly-en-Bière en 1996.