CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC003506897
29 janvier 2002
:center; font-size:14pt } .s662121A1 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom
Page 11 sur 58
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129DEC003447596
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302JUD002555903
2 mars 2006
always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sB9D5CABB {
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0307DEC004912699
7 mars 2002
{ margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } .sB8987CE9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0522JUD001517213
22 mai 2014
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s29100277 { font-family
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1209DEC001220886
9 décembre 1991
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } SUR LA RECEVABILITE &#
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0305DEC001330387
5 mars 1990
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-144982
20 mai 2014
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s39E5096F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0106JUD005026899
6 janvier 2004
:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sF66B8D08 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.85pt } .s4AD8A65C { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1214JUD004097298
14 décembre 1999
:20.15pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:8.8pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s984A15CA { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s11869A80 { margin-top:0pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD003925803
14 octobre 2008
:Arial; font-style:italic; color:#ff0000 } .sF7D12280 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:18pt; text-align:center; font-size:18pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-121063
13 mai 2013
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1010JUD000022502
10 octobre 2006
margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s4B773175 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s9F223FEE { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:17.85pt; margin-bottom:12pt;
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC003163403
1 juin 2006
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5BA5B7C7 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align
ECLI:CEDH:001-243808
19 mai 2025
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC003296796
6 avril 2000
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s598389FD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:16pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0528JUD002195416
28 mai 2020
:section-break } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004DEC000022502
4 octobre 2005
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0108REP001380888
8 janvier 1993
L'instruction de l'affaire débuta à l'audience du 27 février 1974, suivie des audiences des 15 mai 1974 et 20 novembre 1974.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC006124410
17 septembre 2013
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside