49045/22 01/10/2022 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BAGIN 1990 Nataliya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow St Petersburg, 03/04/2022, Anti-war protest Art. 20.3.3 of the CAO, administrative fine of   RUB

  Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Kindler de Barahona v. Portugal (no. 31720/05) The applicants were owners of land that was expropriated in 1975 in the context of a land reform policy.

Russia , nos. 23200/10, 24009/07 and 556/10, 2 October 2012; Bannikova v. Russia , no. 18757/06, 14 October 2010; and Lagutin and Others v.

Kryutchenko’s complaint in this part is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see, for similar reasoning, Bannikova

that the applicants’ complaint is manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see, for similar reasoning, Bannikova

B..., ressortissant de nationalité dominicaine, né le 28 mai 1991 à Barahona (République dominicaine) déclare être entré irrégulièrement sur le territoire le 8 mars 2015.

that the applicants’ complaints are manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see, for similar reasoning, Bannikova

Therefore, in cases where the main evidence originates from an undercover operation, the authorities must be able to demonstrate that they had good reasons for mounting that operation (see Bannikova ,

The Court will rely on whether there were objective suspicions that the applicant had been involved in criminal activity or was predisposed to commit a criminal offence (see Bannikova , cited above, §

xa0; 31/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 10,000 Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 16/06/2021     36871/22* 13/07/2022 Yuliya Aleksandrovna AKSENOVA    Natalya Andreyevna Baranova

    33529/22* 27/04/2022 Nikolay Yuryevich KAVKAZSKIY 1986   Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow 24/02/2022 11.10 p.m.   25/02/2022 1 p.m.

    57263/22* 06/11/2022 Semen KUZMIN 1996 Natalya Andreyevna Baranova Moscow Anti-war protest   Moscow   27/02/2022 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB 11,000 Moscow City Court 07/

applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO     5,000     37020/22 04/07/2022 Viktor Sergeyevich BARANTSEV 1986   Baranova

  Barzakova’s late husbands were also members of the Russian military forces and took part in the same operations. 7.

Denys Sergiyovych Zaporizhzhya 27/01/2006   11/06/2020   14 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 16 day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction 4,800     8590/22 01/02/2022 Oleksandra Oleksiyivna BARANOVA

that the applicants’ complaints are manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see, for similar reasoning, Bannikova

  Kindler de Barahona c.

étaient simplement «   associés   » aux actes criminels ou étaient à l’origine de ces actes, et s’ils avaient exercé des pressions sur le requérant pour qu’il commette l’infraction en cause ( Bannikova

that the applicants’ complaints are manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 (see, for similar reasoning, Bannikova