Azerbaijan (nos. 37816/12 and 25260/14, § 51, 22 April 2021) and Azer Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 3409/10, § 37 and §§ 43-50, 22   July 2021). 75.

accordance with the law” requires not only that the disputed measure has some basis in domestic law, but also that the law is accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see   Azer

34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by eight Azerbaijani nationals, Mr Sakhavat Sarhad oglu Mehtiyev, Mr Tunjay Asaf oglu Guliyev, Mr Azer

Article 8 § 2 if it is in accordance with the law, pursues one or more of the legitimate aims to which that paragraph refers and is necessary in a democratic society in order to achieve any such aim (see Azer

  Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014, and Azer Ahmadov v. Azerbaijan , no. 3409/10, § 79, 22 July 2021). APPLICATION OF ARTICLE   41 OF THE CONVENTION 85.

��Cy��C�_(�p��Ο� %,*�E���{ l����aL$fQV7���VL[׎��v����d%�'�`z�K����YS��;�����Nw����n���^Ct+F�+;Ib�}����aZIr����=���m���Sw�lE�%cl� w��� ��� ��;W��ʻ�l�c [;��m���^H'ƵSNSu����b#�