CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0212JUD003205596
12 février 2002
Ciplak, a lawyer practising in Soma, Turkey. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court. 3.
Page 109 sur 1165
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108DEC001315505
8 novembre 2016
Turkey (dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013; Demiroğlu v. Turkey (dec.), no. 56125/10, 4 June 2013; and Yıldız and Yanak v. Turkey (dec.), no. 44013/07, 27 May 2014. COMPLAINTS 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC000237910
13 mars 2018
Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013). 14.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68245-68713
11 juillet 2000
TURKEY In a judgment notified in writing [1] 1 on 11 July 2000 in the case of G.H.H. and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC004711810
19 juin 2018
Turkey , no. 31610/08, § 53, 29 November 2011, and Erişen and Others v. Turkey , no. 7067/06, § 52, 3 April 2012).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409DEC002202610
9 avril 2013
Turkey , no. 18907/02, § 42, 15 December 2009).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1031JUD006016100
31 octobre 2006
Turkey (no. 42739/98, §§ 20-21, 7 November 2002) and Gençel v. Turkey (no. 53431/99, §§ 11-12, 23 October 2003). 14.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2612335-2839983
20 janvier 2009
Turkey (no. 16162/90) Solomonides v. Turkey (no. 16161/90) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Violation of Article 8 Gavriel v. Turkey (no. 41355/98) Orphanides v.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2846293-3137520
15 septembre 2009
Turkey (no. 30944/04 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: the applicant made no claim Hatipoğlu v.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55821
9 février 1996
Sargin case delivered on 8 June 1995 and transmitted the same day to the Committee of Ministers; Recalling that the case originated in two applications (Nos. 16419/90 and 16426/90) against Turkey
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0228DEC003518308
28 février 2017
Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013); Demiroğlu and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 56125/10, 4 June 2013); and Yıldız and Yanak v. Turkey ((dec.), no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206DEC000311407
6 février 2018
Turkey , (dec.), no. 10755/13, §§ 68-71, 30 April 2013). 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0901DEC000116308
1 septembre 2009
On 7 January 2008 the applicants arrived in Turkey illegally along with five other persons. They were arrested by security forces.
ECLI:CEDH:001-108335
2 décembre 2011
General measures The case presents similarities to those of Dağ and Yaşar against Turkey and Karagöz against Turkey closed by final Resolution CM/ResDH(2007)96 which set out the necessary
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC001391908
22 juin 2010
He fled to Turkey on 9 September 2007. On 16 November 2007 the applicant was arrested in Hatay.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1543175-1615024
22 décembre 2005
TURKEY The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing its Chamber judgment [1] in the case of Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey (application no. 46347/99).
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13243
4 mai 2021
Turkey , Ürper and Ohers v. Turkey and Cumhuriyet Vakfı and Others v.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3167169-3531024
18 juin 2010
Turkey (no. 18405/91) Evagorou Christou v. Turkey (no. 18403/91) Gavriel v. Turkey (no. 41355/98) Ioannou v. Turkey (no. 18364/91) Kyriacou v. Turkey (no. 18407/91) Michael v.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-141165
10 juillet 2013
Turkey); Çengelli and Eryılmaz v. Turkey (287/03); Kaya v. Turkey (36150/02); and Kanbur (No. 2) v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD000209107
24 juillet 2012
Turkey , no. 46213/99, § 60, 20 June 2006, and Kolu v. Turkey , no. 35811/97, § 54, 2 August 2005). 43.