A B, soumet au tribunal un litige relatif à une decision " non datée " par laquelle la présidente de la region Bourgogne-Franche-Comté a rejeté sa demande d'attribution d'une indemnité différentielle pour

_ Odesi Pourvoi n° : P 23-15.123 Demandeur(s) : la société Porteret-Beaulieu industrie (PBI) Avocat(s) : la SCP Célice, Texidor, Périer Défendeur(s) : la Carsat Bourgogne-Franche-Comté

[T] Avocat(s) : la SCP Gadiou et Chevallier Défendeur(s) : le Crédit agricole mutuel de Franche-Comté et autre Avocat(s) : la SARL Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret, la SAS Boucard-Capron-Maman

Pascal Y..., demeurant 51, Cités Grandes Friches à Joeuf (Meurthe-et-Moselle), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 6 juillet 1992 par la cour d'appel de Nancy (chambre sociale), au profit de M.

Ministers decided, in accordance with Article 32, paragraph 2 (art. 32-2), of the Convention, that the Government of France was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 15 000 French

francs in respect of pecuniary damage; - held, that the respondent State was to pay the applicant, within three months 100   000 French francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage; - held that the

francs in respect of non-pecuniary damage and 5 000 French francs in respect of costs and expenses, namely a total sum of 55 000 French francs, and that interest would be payable on any unpaid sum, calculated

France - 25017/94 Judgment 26.9.1997 Article 8 Expulsion Article 8-1 Respect for family life Respect for private life Enforcement of order for permanent exclusion from French territory of convicted Algerian

April 1999, in accordance with former Article 32, paragraph 2, of the Convention, that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 50 000 French

an application (No. 34553/97) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 17 December 1996 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Ms Michelle Christine Dulaurans, a French

representation of an absent appellant: violation   Facts : The applicant, an Algerian national resident in France, was the subject of a deportation order and attempts were made to remove him from French

, in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 80 000 French

The judgment exists only in French.   Section 3   3)   Cloez v.

novembre 1986, par laquelle le Préfet de la Drôme a procédé à l'inscription d'office au budget 1986 de la ville d'une somme de 1 200 000 F correspondant à une dette de ladite ville à l'égard de la société Fralch

in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay each applicant, as just satisfaction, within three months, 75 000 French

ASTEREN, CAISSE D'EPARGNE ET DE PREVOYANCE DE BOURGOGNE FRANCHE-COMTE CAISSE D'EPARGNE ET DE PREVOYANCE DE BOURGOGNE FRANCHE COMTE CAISSE DE CREDIT MUTUEL DE SAINT [F] LYONNAISE DE BANQUE

, in   accordance with Article 32, paragraph   2, of the Convention, that the Government of the respondent State was to pay the applicant as just satisfaction, within three months, 60 000 French

in an application (No. 44211/98) against France, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 10 June 1998 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Mr   Richard   Lacombe, a French