CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 899 résultats pour « Merrily ADRASSE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000717710

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2013

18 juillet 2013

It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.

Page 107 sur 145

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0710JUD000031015

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2020

10 juillet 2020

    The applicant and the Government each filed a memorial on the admissibility and merits of the application.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD001876611

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2015

21 juillet 2015

However, the registration of “ civil unions ” of unmarried couples in such registers has a merely symbolic value. 6.     Subsequent domestic case-law 45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004838609

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

It did not in its decision address the applicant’s request for an oral hearing. 33.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD000276313

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

    Merits (a)     General principles 66.     The Court reiterates that Article 3 of the Convention enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic society.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD004098407

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3 of the Convention). 5.     Mr K.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD001700620

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

Merits Submissions by the parties (a)    The applicant 43.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217DEC002049617

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2019

17 décembre 2019

order was dismissed on 2 November 2015 by the Tallinn Court of Appeal, which considered her statement that some of the money (EUR 3,000) found in the safety deposit box belonged to her mother to be merely

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1008JUD007740014

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2020

8 octobre 2020

Troisième Voie and Envie de Rêver have registered offices at the same address, namely those premises.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC006153310

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2012

22 mai 2012

He initially claimed to be visiting his brother but, when pressed, did not know his brother’s address or phone number. When questioned further, he claimed asylum.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2014

3 juillet 2014

  PROCEDURE ON THE MERITS BEFORE THE GRAND CHAMBER 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD000743217

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2023

5 octobre 2023

    The Azerbaijani Government fully shared the applicant’s position on the merits of the case, contending that the actions taken by the authorities of the respondent State had been aimed at

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0325JUD001313487

Admin. suprême

25 mars 1993

25 mars 1993

The Court heard addresses by Mr Bratza for the Government, by Sir Basil Hall for the Commission, and by Ms Beale for the applicant. AS TO THE FACTS I. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD000018402

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

  The Court heard addresses by Mr Laptev and Mr Daniel. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144544

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

of the Court of Human Rights in Phillips v   United Kingdom (Application No 41087/98) 5 July 2001 I would hold that Part VI of the 1988 Act is a proportionate response to the problem which it addresses

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD007211801

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2007

15 novembre 2007

    The Chamber having decided, after consulting the parties, that no hearing on the merits was required (Rule 59 § 3 in fine ), the parties replied in writing to each other's observations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC002037317

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

The Knin Minor Offences Court ... did not assess the merits of the [cited] case since it acquitted the accused on account of an erroneous legal qualification of the offence ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1020DEC002314493

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 1995

20 octobre 1995

        On   6 July 1994, the Commission decided to communicate the application to the Government and to ask for written observations on the admissibility and merits

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD005981319

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

Merits Submissions by the parties (a)    The applicant 45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113075

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2008

10 décembre 2008

It follows that this is the appropriate moment to refer to the suggestion proposed by Mr   Kamenos’ advocate in his final address.

Source officielle