CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000717710
18 juillet 2013
It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). THE FACTS I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE A.
Page 107 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0710JUD000031015
10 juillet 2020
The applicant and the Government each filed a memorial on the admissibility and merits of the application.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD001876611
21 juillet 2015
However, the registration of “ civil unions ” of unmarried couples in such registers has a merely symbolic value. 6. Subsequent domestic case-law 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004838609
15 octobre 2015
It did not in its decision address the applicant’s request for an oral hearing. 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD000276313
12 janvier 2016
Merits (a) General principles 66. The Court reiterates that Article 3 of the Convention enshrines one of the most fundamental values of democratic society.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD004098407
22 avril 2010
It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3 of the Convention). 5. Mr K.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD001700620
26 août 2025
Merits Submissions by the parties (a) The applicant 43.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217DEC002049617
17 décembre 2019
order was dismissed on 2 November 2015 by the Tallinn Court of Appeal, which considered her statement that some of the money (EUR 3,000) found in the safety deposit box belonged to her mother to be merely
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1008JUD007740014
8 octobre 2020
Troisième Voie and Envie de Rêver have registered offices at the same address, namely those premises.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC006153310
22 mai 2012
He initially claimed to be visiting his brother but, when pressed, did not know his brother’s address or phone number. When questioned further, he claimed asylum.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0703JUD001325507
3 juillet 2014
PROCEDURE ON THE MERITS BEFORE THE GRAND CHAMBER 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD000743217
5 octobre 2023
The Azerbaijani Government fully shared the applicant’s position on the merits of the case, contending that the actions taken by the authorities of the respondent State had been aimed at
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0325JUD001313487
25 mars 1993
The Court heard addresses by Mr Bratza for the Government, by Sir Basil Hall for the Commission, and by Ms Beale for the applicant. AS TO THE FACTS I. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD000018402
11 janvier 2007
The Court heard addresses by Mr Laptev and Mr Daniel. 5.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144544
6 mai 2014
of the Court of Human Rights in Phillips v United Kingdom (Application No 41087/98) 5 July 2001 I would hold that Part VI of the 1988 Act is a proportionate response to the problem which it addresses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115JUD007211801
15 novembre 2007
The Chamber having decided, after consulting the parties, that no hearing on the merits was required (Rule 59 § 3 in fine ), the parties replied in writing to each other's observations.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0122DEC002037317
22 janvier 2019
The Knin Minor Offences Court ... did not assess the merits of the [cited] case since it acquitted the accused on account of an erroneous legal qualification of the offence ...
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1020DEC002314493
20 octobre 1995
On 6 July 1994, the Commission decided to communicate the application to the Government and to ask for written observations on the admissibility and merits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD005981319
Merits Submissions by the parties (a) The applicant 45.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113075
10 décembre 2008
It follows that this is the appropriate moment to refer to the suggestion proposed by Mr Kamenos’ advocate in his final address.