They argued that the seizure was unlawful because they did not have any procedural status in the criminal proceedings and the seized goods belonged to them and not to G. and that the value of the seized

The court awarded Amber Grid 2,482 euros (EUR), payable by the applicant, for litigation costs the company had incurred because it had been represented by an advocate.

    The applicants complained that their removal to Italy would be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention because of alleged deficiencies in the reception system for asylum-seekers. 6.

information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2023)816 );   Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in these cases because

However, it considered that it could not retain the case for examination because in the absence of the requested evidence the existence of all the elements of an offence could not be established clearly

It held that the applicant had suffered distressed because she had considered that there was an armed confrontation happening in her flat and not because she had thought that the police were conducting

the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2024)1159 and DH-DD(2024)1194);   Noting with deep regret that no further measures could be taken in these cases because

    The applicants complained that their removal to Italy would be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention because of alleged deficiencies in the reception system for asylum-seekers. 5.

The argument that the expulsion had nevertheless been justified because he represented a security risk could not be accepted because of the absolute nature of the guarantee under Article   3.

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention the applicant complains that the proceedings concerning the withdrawal of his security clearance were unfair because the principle of equality of arms was breached

Indigo Gym S.R.L. challenged the decision of March 2021 and claimed pecuniary damages for the alleged loses it had suffered because of it.

After giving birth, the applicant was refused a maternity allowance because the police social security scheme did not provide for maternity benefits.

She also complained under Article 8, alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, that she had been discriminated against, claiming that she was refused a lump sum for accommodation because

Sabail District Court dismissed the applicant’s claims and held that the interception of communication had been lawful since the decision of the Sabail District Court of 14 March 2008 concerned him too because

B C, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler les décisions du 9 janvier 2025 par lesquelles la préfète du Rhône a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour, lui a fait obligation

    The applicants complained that their removal to Italy would be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention because of alleged deficiencies in the reception system for asylum-seekers. 5.

From fall 2001 the applicants were unable to use the disputed land because S. had started to use it.

    The date of the preliminary hearing, scheduled for 22 January 1992, was first postponed until 15 April 1992 at the Public Prosecutor's request, then adjourned because of the political elections

B A, représenté par Me Béchaux, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler le jugement n° 2304801 du 10 octobre 2023 du tribunal administratif de Lyon et les décisions préfectorales du 13 février 2023 ; 2°)