CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 112 résultats pour « Quintel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD002658707

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2014

26 juin 2014

  30194/09, 21 June 2011, in which the applicant spent forty-five minutes at the police station; Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom , no.

Source officielle

Page 106 sur 106

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD004290612

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2016

28 avril 2016

further points out that Article 5 § 1 may apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short duration, where applicants are stopped for a search for a period not exceeding thirty minutes (see Gillan and Quinton

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0305JUD002871809

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2015

5 mars 2015

Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD005871710

Admin. suprême

20 février 2020

20 février 2020

purposes of a search for a period which did not exceed thirty minutes during which they were entirely deprived of any freedom of movement and were obliged to remain where they were (see Gillan and Quinton

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD002834911

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise with sufficient clarity to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see Gillan and Quinton

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124JUD001341803

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

In view of the above circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant’s arrest and subsequent detention constituted a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (see Gillan and Quinton

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD006106410

Admin. suprême

13 février 2018

13 février 2018

    The Government submitted some statistical data for 2009-11 aimed at demonstrating (by contrast to the Court’s findings in Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD004044207

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2019

8 octobre 2019

In support of her request the prosecutor submitted that there was no evidence that that the applicant had a pre-disposition to sell drugs in large quantiles ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0707JUD000432206

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2016

7 juillet 2016

Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see, among other authorities, Gillan and Quinton

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164551

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2016

10 juin 2016

He said (at paragraph 113): “It is to be hoped that this burst of ASBO-mania will quieten down, and that its use will in time be limited to appropriate and serious cases, where no other means of intervention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC001154304

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

CURCI 31/01/1955 Giovanna FAILA 23/12/1956 Adriano VOLPI 30/07/1949 Laura BONETTI 11/03/1949 Paola DI PASQUALE 08/08/1950 Maria Teresa OTTAVI 11/06/1945 Francesca Romana MOSCHELLA 22/02/1954 Sonia QUINTILI

Source officielle
CC

cr

61372695cd58014677426c34

Cassation

8 mars 2006

8 mars 2006

Consulter le texte intégral →