sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2001)98 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 5 December 2000 in the case of Bekdemir against Turkey

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2001)150 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 1 March 2001 in the case of Gelgeç and Özdemir against Turkey

His wife left Turkey where they lived and started divorce proceedings in the United Kingdom.

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)12 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 25 September 2003 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Satık against Turkey

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)44 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 27 February 2001 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Alpay against Turkey

Turkey , no. 46117/99, §§ 103-126, ECHR 2004 ‑ X)?   4.     Has the Bursa Administrative Court’s judgment of 22 January 2007 been   executed?

, Hanifi IRMAK against Turkey, and Ahmet TUNÇ against Turkey lodged on 23 January 2016 and 26 January 2016 respectively QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

The applications concern the alleged push ‑ backs of the applicants from Greece back to Turkey after they crossed the borders in Evros-Edirne area in February 2020. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Turkey [GC], no.   21986/93, § 104, ECHR 2000 ‑ VII and Osmanoğlu v.   Turkey , no.   48804/99, §§ 77-84, 24 January 2008)?   In this connection,   3.1.

Turkey , 25 November 1997, §§ 66-73, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ VII, and Hanževački v.   Croatia , no.   17182/07, § 25, 16 April 2009)?   4.

– a Syrian national and two stateless Palestinians – were arrested in Turkey on suspicion of breaching the Meetings and Demonstration Marches Act (Law no.

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)20 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 12 April 2001 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Akın against Turkey

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2005)11 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 October 2003 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Karatay against Turkey

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)21 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 14 November 2000 (Friendly settlement) in the case of B.T. and others against Turkey

s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2004)24 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 31 May 2001 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Kortak against Turkey

page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2004)23 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 26 February 2002 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Kaplan against Turkey

0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2006)22 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 December 2004 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Kaptan against Turkey

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2004)91 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 9 October 2003 (final on 9 January 2004) in the case of Gönülşen against Turkey

page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2004)25 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 7 June 2001 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Z.E. and others against Turkey

margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2002)141 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 26 June 2001 in the case of Dindaroğlu and others against Turkey