Turkey (no. 20259/06)* Erhan Dinç v. Turkey (no. 28551/06)* The applicants are two Turkish nationals who live in Turkey.

  Turkey , no.   74321/01, §§ 19-24, 3 May 2007; Şayık and   Others v. Turkey , cited above, §§ 28-32 and Yiğitdoğan v. Turkey , no.   20827/08, § 19, 16   March 2010). 10.

Turkey (no.

The requests were then sent to the Republic’s embassy in Athens for communication to Turkey. 58 .

Turkey - 10226/03 Judgment 30.1.2007 [Section II] Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 Choice of the legislature Free expression of opinion of people Requirement for political parties to obtain at least 10% of

margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } Resolution ResDH(2004)106 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 24 June 2003 (Friendly settlement) in the case of Halit Yalçın against Turkey

July 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 34502/97) against Turkey

21.85pt } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } Published on 6 April 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 27822/17 Süleyman BAĞRIYANIK against Turkey

The Court observes that a new domestic remedy has been established in Turkey after the application of the pilot judgment procedure in the case of Ümmühan Kaplan v.

On 29 May 2007 the first three applicants fled Iran and entered Turkey illegally. The fourth applicant is the mother of the second applicant and grandmother of the third and fourth applicants.

COLLECTIVITES LOCALES - QUESTIONS COMMUNES ET COOPERATION - CONTROLE DE LA LEGALITE DES ACTES DES AUTORITES LOCALES - DEFERE PREFECTORAL - DELAI DU DEFERE | 33-02-03 ETABLISSEMENTS PUBLICS - REGIME JURIDIQUE - TUTELLE

. - NOTION DE TERRITOIRE ANTERIEUREMENT PLACE SOUS LA SOUVERAINETE, LE PROTECTORAT OU LA TUTELLE DE LA FRANCE [ART, 1 DE LA LOI DU 26-12-1961]..* CAS DU SENEGAL.

Turkey (dec.), no. 5177/07, 16 October 2012, and Gürceğiz v. Turkey , no. 11045/07, §§ 21-22, 15 November 2012).

Turkey (application no.   23168/94); Polat v. Turkey (no. 23500/94); Ceylan v. Turkey (no. 23556/94); Okçuoğlu v. Turkey (no. 24146/94); Gerger v. Turkey (no.

Turkey , no. 43928/98, §§   17 and 19, 23 September 2003, Özel v. Turkey no. 42739/98, §§ 20-21, 7   November 2002, and Gençel v. Turkey , no. 53431/99, §§ 11-12, 23   October 2003.

Turkey , no. 50934/99, §§ 25-40, 21   March 2006; Ulusoy v. Turkey , no. 52709/99, §§ 31-49, 31 July 2007; Savgın v.   Turkey , no. 13304/03, §§ 39-48, 2 February 2010; Gül and Others v.

  Turkey (dec.), no. 38587/97, ECHR 2002 ‑ III; and Finozhenok v.   Russia   (dec.), 3025/06, 31 May 2011). 12.

Turkey , no. 75460/10, §§ 48-61, 17 September 2019, and Ruşen Bayar v. Turkey , no. 25253/08, §§ 113-123, 19 February 2019 with further references therein).

#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — EU-Turkey statements of 8 and 18 March 2016 — Implementation by the European Union or by the Member States of the measures concerned — Documents drawn