CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2001:303
31 mai 2001
#Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 1612/68 - Luxembourg maternity, childbirth and child-raising allowances - Residence condition - Rights of a person receiving a pension but not resident in the Member
Page 104 sur 385
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0519DEC001700490
19 mai 1992
In early August they went to Israel and planted three trees as a symbol of their wish to have the child.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD001631413
7 juin 2018
The first two are when a child is born in wedlock (see Andrle (dec.), no.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2594667-2812114
8 janvier 2009
The first applicant was granted interim custody of the child and parental responsibility was granted to both parents jointly.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207891
12 janvier 2021
The court decision confirming the agreement for divorce established, among other things, that the exercise of parental rights in respect of their only child born in 2004 would be given to the father and
ECLI:CEDH:001-165533
5 juillet 2016
They also ordered the applicant to make monthly child maintenance payments amounting to 500 euros (EUR) until the custody proceedings had been finalised by the Irish authorities. 7.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109759
8 mars 2012
As noted below statutory guidance in relation to child protection and care planning has been recently revised. General Measures 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD003492207
19 janvier 2010
s access rights; ordered him to pay monthly child maintenance; and decided that each party should bear its own costs. 9.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613DEC005993510
13 juin 2017
On 28 December 2014 the first applicant gave birth to her third child, Ilya Igorevich Ozhegov.
4ème Chambre
DTA_2501336_20250708
8 juillet 2025
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des pièces complémentaires enregistrées les 4 avril et 7 mai 2025 Mme B A, représentée par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 5
ECLI:CEDH:001-174132
12 mai 2017
The court found that on 53 dates E. had obstructed the applicant’s contact with the child.
ECLI:CEDH:001-91153
9 janvier 2009
The European Court considered that the Naumburg Court of Appeal’s decision not to give custody to the applicant failed to take into consideration the long-term effects on the child of a permanent
ECLI:EU:C:2008:61
31 janvier 2008
occupation - Articles 1, 2(1), (2)(a) and (3) and 3(1)(c) - Direct discrimination on grounds of disability - Harassment related to disability - Dismissal of an employee who is not himself disabled but whose child
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC003176296
21 mai 1997
On 30 November 1995 a child was born to the couple.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD001543719
12 octobre 2021
child L. and the applicant continued to share the care of both children with their mother until 2013.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0706DEC005367500
6 juillet 2004
born of the marriage who actually belongs to the family unit ( gezin ), and – a minor child born outside the marriage who actually belongs to the family unit (e.g. a child of one of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0609JUD000974982
9 juin 1988
Such compensation was to cover the loss of consortium of his child S and the mental anguish and distress which he had sustained and continued to sustain.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530DEC006520201
30 mai 2006
At the time of his application to the Benefits Agency he was not in receipt of child benefit. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC004685520
5 septembre 2023
It found that that court had reacted properly by instituting ex officio proceedings when the best interest of the child was in danger.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001597809
4 décembre 2018
The Court has previously examined cases in which a man wished to institute proceedings to contest the paternity of a child.