CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

7 691 résultats pour « Chilly »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2001:303

CJUE

31 mai 2001

31 mai 2001

#Regulations (EEC) Nos 1408/71 and 1612/68 - Luxembourg maternity, childbirth and child-raising allowances - Residence condition - Rights of a person receiving a pension but not resident in the Member

Source officielle

Page 104 sur 385

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0519DEC001700490

Admin. suprême

19 mai 1992

19 mai 1992

In early August they went to Israel and planted three trees as a symbol of their wish to have the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0607JUD001631413

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2018

7 juin 2018

The first two are when a child is born in wedlock (see Andrle (dec.), no.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2594667-2812114

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

The first applicant was granted interim custody of the child and parental responsibility was granted to both parents jointly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-207891

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2021

12 janvier 2021

The court decision confirming the agreement for divorce established, among other things, that the exercise of parental rights in respect of their only child born in 2004 would be given to the father and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165533

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2016

5 juillet 2016

They also ordered the applicant to make monthly child maintenance payments amounting to 500   euros (EUR) until the custody proceedings had been finalised by the Irish authorities. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109759

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2012

8 mars 2012

As noted below statutory guidance in relation to child protection and care planning has been recently revised.   General Measures   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD003492207

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

s access rights; ordered him to pay monthly child maintenance; and decided that each party should bear its own costs. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613DEC005993510

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2017

13 juin 2017

On 28 December 2014 the first applicant gave birth to her third child, Ilya Igorevich Ozhegov.

Source officielle
TA

4ème Chambre

DTA_2501336_20250708

Administratif

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et des pièces complémentaires enregistrées les 4 avril et 7 mai 2025 Mme B A, représentée par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 5

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-174132

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2017

12 mai 2017

The court found that on 53   dates E. had obstructed the applicant’s contact with the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-91153

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2009

9 janvier 2009

  The European Court considered that the Naumburg Court of Appeal’s decision not to give custody to the applicant failed to take into consideration the long-term effects on the child of a permanent

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2008:61

CJUE

31 janvier 2008

31 janvier 2008

occupation - Articles 1, 2(1), (2)(a) and (3) and 3(1)(c) - Direct discrimination on grounds of disability - Harassment related to disability - Dismissal of an employee who is not himself disabled but whose child

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0521DEC003176296

Admin. suprême

21 mai 1997

21 mai 1997

On 30 November 1995 a child was born to the couple.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD001543719

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2021

12 octobre 2021

child L. and the applicant continued to share the care of both children with their mother until 2013.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0706DEC005367500

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2004

6 juillet 2004

born of the marriage who actually belongs to the family unit ( gezin ), and –     a minor child born outside the marriage who actually belongs to the family unit (e.g. a child of one of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0609JUD000974982

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1988

9 juin 1988

Such compensation was to cover the loss of consortium of his child S and the mental anguish and distress which he had sustained and continued to sustain.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530DEC006520201

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2006

30 mai 2006

At the time of his application to the Benefits Agency he was not in receipt of child benefit. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905DEC004685520

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

It found that that court had reacted properly by instituting ex officio proceedings when the best interest of the child was in danger.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001597809

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

    The Court has previously examined cases in which a man wished to institute proceedings to contest the paternity of a child.

Source officielle