It considered that their best interests did not require a derogation from the maintenance requirement merely because that requirement could lead to an interruption of family ties.

Merits Submissions by the parties 25.

(b)     Merits 31.     The Court has previously found violations in similar cases against Ukraine (see Zhuk , cited above, §§ 29-35; Korobov v. Ukraine , no.

The Court of Appeal rejected that argument, stating: “The whole point was the necessity, as the original judge saw it, of not merely leaving it to those responsible for the sentence in the Ministry of

    Merits 30.

Lindgård , advokat,   Counsels The Court heard addresses by Mr. Lehmann and Mr. Melchior for the Government, by Mr. Opsahl for the Commission and by Mrs.

    Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions 41.     The Government did not make any observations on the merits. 42.

The Court heard addresses by the above-mentioned representatives and Mrs Antunes's reply to the question put by one of its members. AS TO THE FACTS I.

    Merits 1.     The parties’ submissions (a)     The Government 22.

Merits Submissions by the parties 21 .

The court notes, in so far as the applicant alleges that her shelter in the church is merely temporary, that the applicant’s representative has indicated during the hearing that the applicant remains in

On 24 January 2000 the SBU Detention Centre informed the applicant that the aforementioned complaints had not been sent to the designated addressees, but had been transferred to the Prosecution Service

Obviously, the said statement was merely the result of his despair and frustration and had no foundation.

the notice of the respondent Government and         invite them to submit written observations on its         admissibility and merits

The applicant appealed against this decision, arguing that the authorities had failed to address the issue of the persons inhabiting the property. 40.

Merits The parties’ arguments (a)    The applicant 35 .

As concerns the merits of the case, it held that the penalty imposed by İGDAŞ was contrary to the Contract.

    In that correspondence the applicant described the situation in the Novi Sad office in general and made an informal reference to a certain Mr B, who was an “invented character”, merely in

    Merits 25.