CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Cour d'Appel
6253cb30bd3db21cbdd8d0cb
21 avril 2009
COUR, lors des débats et du délibéré, Président : Madame NIRDÉ-DORAIL, désignée par ordonnance de Monsieur le Premier Président en date du 19 décembre 2008, Conseillers : Monsieur SOUBISE, Madame DELPEY-CORBAUX
Page 103 sur 868
6253cbc5bd3db21cbdd8e371
27 juin 2011
née le 30 Octobre 1977 à MOULAY BOUAZZA (MAROC) ... 01710 THOIRY représentée par Me Jean-Louis VERRIERE, avoué à la Cour assistée de Me Carole DELAY, avocat au barreau de l'AIN (bénéficie d'une
Tribunal Administratif de Grenoble
ORTA_2204383_20221202
2 décembre 2022
A, représenté par Me Delay, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 21 janvier 2022 par lequel le maire de la commune de Domarin a accordé un permis de construire modificatif n° PC 38149 21
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0403JUD003710497
3 avril 2003
No major undue delays occurred before July 1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD003020904
6 novembre 2008
It notes however that the delay incurred was negligible. 61.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD000352414
12 janvier 2017
The applicants complained about the delay to the Inspectorate of the Supreme Judicial Council, asking that disciplinary sanctions be imposed on the new presiding judge.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD000270104
15 janvier 2009
The applicants maintained their complaints insisting that the judgments had been enforced with unreasonable delays or enforced only partly. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD000517305
27 octobre 2009
The delay caused thereby was excessive, in the Court's view.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0111REP001603690
11 janvier 1995
The applicant refers in particular to delays in the proceedings before the administrative authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1207JUD004311604
7 décembre 2006
The delays in the enforcement of the judgments in the applicant's favour were due to the large number of enforcement proceedings against the debtor and its financial difficulties. 12.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0318DEC004471598
18 mars 2004
rely on the means of redress provided under Article 105 of the Code of Obligations to afford them a prospect of obtaining damages for loss resulting from monetary depreciation exceeding interest for delay
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0621DEC005949800
21 juin 2001
It ordered payment of the money due and a penalty in respect of the delay. On 9 April 1999 the Shakhty Bailiff’s Service ( Служба судебных приставов г.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0617DEC004607299
17 juin 2003
They submit that the applicant’s conduct contributed to the delay and make reference to, inter alia , several instances of changing his counterclaim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708DEC001324302
8 juillet 2003
Civil Code of Ukraine Under Article 214 of the Civil Code, in case of delay in the fulfilment of its financial obligations, the debtor must, upon a claim of the creditor, pay the amount of the debt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC000225904
6 décembre 2011
The Government argued that this complaint was inadmissible as the period of the delay in the enforcement of the judgments in the present cases had been reasonable, the judgments had been enforced in full
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD003661905
12 janvier 2012
On several occasions the courts had to renew, at the parties’ request, the term for lodging an appeal, finding no fault on their part, which resulted in delays of about one and half months. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD004346309
21 juin 2016
The Court finds that the applicant has not contributed to the length of the proceedings, but that there were major delays before the domestic authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207DEC001307105
7 décembre 2010
There was no appearance of a violation of the applicant’s right to a hearing without unjustified delay in that respect.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0721JUD002098121
21 juillet 2022
month(s) and 10 day(s) Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The obligatory 6-month and 1 ‑ year reviews of the applicant’s detention took place with delays
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0331JUD002198021
31 mars 2022
2019 to 01/12/2021 2 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 28 day(s) Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The obligatory 6 ‑ month detention review was carried out with a delay