AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628JUD005559709
28 juin 2011
28 juin 2011
Article 8 of the Convention and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [...]
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0211DEC006104713
11 février 2014
11 février 2014
The public prosecutor accused the applicant of six counts of child abuse. The private prosecutor accused him of seven counts of child abuse.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626JUD002595906
26 juin 2007
26 juin 2007
Article 224, placing special emphasis on the best interests of the child, provides that there shall be an initial period of three days for voluntary compliance with a child custody order.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC005654700
11 décembre 2001
11 décembre 2001
After a child protection conference, on 2 March 1998, the local authority decided that the unborn child should go on the ‘At Risk’ register under the category of risk from physical abuse.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC007147501
25 septembre 2007
25 septembre 2007
The basis of confidence between mother and child was seriously disturbed.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201JUD000867305
1 décembre 2009
1 décembre 2009
The court shall take the child’s view into account if the child expresses his or her view ... Section 106 “A child has the right to have contact with both parents.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2054633-2174214
28 juin 2007
28 juin 2007
The refusal to declare the Peruvian adoption judgment enforceable had been aimed at protecting “health or morals” and the “rights and freedoms” of the child.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68269-68737
27 avril 2000
27 avril 2000
The Court recalled that the mutual enjoyment of each other’s company by parent and child, as well as grandparent and child, constitutes a fundamental element of family life, and domestic measures
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3194121-3556272
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
The court held that the child’s removal from Israel without the father’s consent was wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192048
26 février 2019
26 février 2019
Their first child A was born in 1993, and their children B, C and D were born in 1996, 1998 and 2001 respectively. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711DEC000769220
11 juillet 2023
11 juillet 2023
Further examinations revealed that the child had several broken ribs in addition to the bruises. On 10 July 2014 an emergency care order was issued. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0124JUD001210513
24 janvier 2023
24 janvier 2023
The child died at 7.45 a.m. 4 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002096592
30 novembre 1994
30 novembre 1994
When lodging his application he was resident with his family, namely his wife, also a Turkish second-generation immigrant, and their small child, at Hohenems, Austria.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-786
5 octobre 2010
5 octobre 2010
Respect for family life Refusal to grant adoptive parent order revoking adoption: inadmissible Facts – In 1983 the applicant and her husband were granted authorisation for the full adoption of a child
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197184
2 octobre 2019
2 octobre 2019
been violent towards her in the past, and convicted by a French court of first instance for it (exception provided by Article 13 of the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189560
18 décembre 2018
18 décembre 2018
obligation under Article 8 of the Convention to act in a manner calculated to enable an existing family tie to develop, to take any measures that can be reasonably expected with a view of reunification of a child
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229303
6 novembre 2023
6 novembre 2023
FIRST SECTION Application no. 34271/19 Rozália BÁNÓCZI against Hungary lodged on 3 June 2019 communicated on 6 November 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant is one of the paternal aunts of a child
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216150
7 février 2022
7 février 2022
In 2019 the applicant sought to limit the visiting rights of Y.’s father and to increase his child maintenance.
Source officielle8ème chambre 2ème section
6686e8ade74459e0c7ed287b
4 juillet 2024
4 juillet 2024
Le Syndicat des coproprietaires du [Adresse 2]- [Adresse 4], représentée par son syndic, CPAB CABINET PARISIEN D’ADMINISTRATION DE BIENS, SARL [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] représenté par Maître Audrey CHELLY
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Nice
ORTA_2400459_20240415
15 avril 2024
15 avril 2024
B A, représenté par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision implicite de rejet née du silence gardé par le préfet des Alpes-Maritimes sur sa demande de titre de séjour ; 2°) d'enjoindre
Source officiellePage 102 sur 385