found that the applicants were discriminated against because of their ineligibility to stand for election to the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina (the collective Head of State

and that the proposed HIU has been presented by the authorities since 2015 as part of general measures to take over the work of the OPONI and the HET;   Emphasising that it is primarily for the State

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

Recalling that the violations found in the present cases cannot be understood as requiring that the applicants be given the prospect of imminent release considering that, according to the Court’s case-law, States

proceedings and stressing that the introduction of measures aimed at combating this will contribute, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, to improving the protection of human rights in member States

be taken under Article 46 for the satisfactory execution of the Ivanov pilot judgment, which was not met;   DEEPLY DEPLORED that the present rate of implementation of judgment debts against the State

legislative reform already in 2017 and notwithstanding the Committee’s repeated calls in this respect, no written information was provided by the authorities;   Emphasising the legal obligation of every State

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

of Sunni Islam to opt out of compulsory religious education, without pupils’ parents being obliged to disclose their religious or philosophical convictions;   Underlining the obligation of every State

and seven years after the expiry of the deadline set by the Court in its pilot judgment, progress needs to be urgently achieved regarding these issues;   Emphasising the legal obligation of every State

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

of domestic final decisions represents a grave danger to the rule of law, risks undermining the confidence of citizens in the judicial system, and as such calls into question the credibility of the State

Respondent State urged to take measures of a general character

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

legislative lacuna regulating the conditions and procedures for full gender reassignment surgery still exists more than 15 years since the judgment became final;   Underlining the obligation of every State

decisions to prolong placements in psychiatric hospitals as security measures and to safeguards against arbitrary or unlawful deprivations of liberty in this context; Underlining the obligation of every State

final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State

about the absence of updated information requested regarding the issues of material conditions of detention and detention in special security regimes;   Emphasising the legal obligation of every State