Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-197171
2 octobre 2019
2 octobre 2019
The applicant admitted his guilt and expressed remorse. The Klaipėda Regional Court 4. On 8 March 2018 the Klaipėda Regional Court convicted the applicant of aggravated murder.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC005139207
14 décembre 2010
14 décembre 2010
It observed, however, that a person’s guilt could be established only by a judgment of a court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0206DEC000256865
6 février 1968
6 février 1968
These effects have been steadily intensified by adverse decisions and proceedings .... and by absence of motivation which apparently, have no other effect than to create a suspicion of guilt and
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cc3abd3db21cbdd8f8c5
19 juin 2012
19 juin 2012
Marie-Thérèse X... a été embauchée le 1er juillet 2000 par la sarl établissements Joël Lemaître en qualité de secrétaire comptable coefficient 220 Elle a été affectée au dépôt construit sur la commune de Guilliers
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0423DEC005452800
23 avril 2002
23 avril 2002
applicant claims that the latter was of the utmost importance for his defence since material was found on the knickers which the prosecution and the Assize Court treated as strong corroborative evidence of guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0227JUD003272312
27 février 2020
27 février 2020
It considered that, once the applicant had “decided to confess his guilt” in the beginning of the criminal proceedings, the mere fact that he had retracted that confession later on did not have to be interpreted
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC001904206
14 décembre 2010
14 décembre 2010
first-instance court decision, that of the Court of Appeal was brief, simply stating that the applicant had committed the administrative offence and that “other materials of the case” confirmed his guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1014DEC001624790
14 octobre 1992
14 octobre 1992
presumption of innocence as laid down in Article 6 para. 2 (art. 6-2) of the Convention to refer to a continued state of suspicion where this does not amount to a determination of the accused person's guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169254
6 novembre 2016
6 novembre 2016
S.T. admitted his guilt and accepted to benefit from special expedient criminal proceedings provided by the criminal procedure code for situations where the suspect confessed to all charges against him
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1103DEC003964406
3 novembre 2020
3 novembre 2020
At trial, the applicant denied his guilt and insisted that it was K. who had punched and stabbed the victim.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-127701
5 octobre 2013
5 octobre 2013
The applicant’s guilt was supported by the evidence of the co-accused.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416DEC003501520
16 avril 2024
16 avril 2024
The applicant’s guilt was based on the testimony of P.G., the interception of the telephone communications, the witness statements from the preparatory proceedings, and on the voice analysis and opinion
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1017DEC002140017
17 octobre 2017
17 octobre 2017
In the applicants’ view, the plea bargain that the first applicant had negotiated in Italy could not be considered to be a finding of guilt for the alleged predicate offences of the laundering
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC003007506
23 novembre 2010
23 novembre 2010
When questioned on 14 June 2005, in the presence of the new lawyer, he denied any involvement in the murders while acknowledging his guilt in the robbery.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0926JUD003416715
26 septembre 2023
26 septembre 2023
The application concerns the fairness of criminal proceedings in which the applicant’s guilt was allegedly determined solely on the basis of “a flawed identification offered by the victim
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0113DEC005725700
13 janvier 2004
13 janvier 2004
discontinuation of the proceedings may raise an issue under Article 6 § 2 if supporting reasoning, which cannot be dissociated from the operative provisions, amounts in substance to a determination of the guilt
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160670
11 janvier 2016
11 janvier 2016
Article 62 “With regard to the commission of a criminal offence, a person shall be presumed innocent and shall not be subjected to criminal punishment until his or her guilt is proved through legal procedure
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128DEC002146605
28 novembre 2017
28 novembre 2017
At trial the applicant admitted his guilt as regards the robbery but denied murder. 16.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC002388419
23 septembre 2025
23 septembre 2025
The Court notes that, having quashed the county court’s acquittal judgment, the court of appeal engaged in a new evaluation of the facts and made a full assessment of the applicant’s guilt
Source officielleDeuxième Chambre
678026039c3ba90f51dc36cb
9 janvier 2025
9 janvier 2025
451 022 610, dont le siège social est à [Adresse 9], en liquidation judiciaire, représentée par son liquidateur, Maître [W] [T], domiciliée en cette qualité [Adresse 4]. représentée par Maître Elisa GUEILHERS
Source officiellePage 101 sur 292