CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1105DEC001000906
5 novembre 2013
With the aim of providing their child with a pluralistic and secular education, in conformity with their philosophy of life, the first and second applicants requested that their child be exempted from
Page 101 sur 385
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7308
27 novembre 2012
The parties agreed that the marriage should be dissolved, but not on the arrangements for child maintenance and contact. In 2005 the applicant brought a separate action contesting his paternity.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14218
4 septembre 2023
the view, on a general level: – that, according to the most recent scientific research (as presented in the two opinions of the Agency of Biomedicine issued in 2017 and 2021), the health risk for the child
ECLI:CEDH:002-1204
1 décembre 2009
Slovenia - 8673/05 and 9733/05 Judgment 1.12.2009 [Section III] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Failure adequately to enforce a father’s right of access to his minor child
ECLI:CEDH:002-14226
ECLI:CEDH:002-1940
30 septembre 2008
The police were informed of the incident and the applicants were again interviewed on several occasions by police officers and social workers, who proposed to call a child protection conference.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2242735-2391691
17 janvier 2008
The application concerns the refusal by the French authorities to grant the applicant’s request to adopt a child, allegedly on account of her sexual orientation.
Reconduites à la frontière
DTA_2303196_20230901
1 septembre 2023
Parisien, - les observations de Me Chelly pour M. A, assisté de M. B, interprète en langue arabe.
DTA_2303201_20230901
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC004980108
4 décembre 2012
The applicant, the father of a child, complained under Articles 6 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, in particular, that he had suffered gender-based discrimination
Tribunal Administratif de MELUN
DTA_2208011_20230123
23 janvier 2023
F B, de Mme E G et d'un représentant habilité de la commune de Chailly-en-Bière.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244136
11 juin 2025
In its report of 5 August 2020, the Child Care Protection Board concluded that it was in the child’s interest to remain with the foster family.
4ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_23LY00625_20241219
19 décembre 2024
d'annuler la décision du 16 mars 2021 par laquelle le maire de Pont-sur-Vanne a rejeté sa demande tendant au rétablissement de la libre circulation sur le chemin rural n° 20 dit " B et du Finage de Chigy
1re Section - 3e Chambre
DTA_2111209_20221019
19 octobre 2022
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 25 mai 2021, Mme A C, représentée par Me Chelly, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision implicite de rejet née du silence gardé par
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD003503004
15 décembre 2005
the child is, a period of less than one year has elapsed from the date of the wrongful removal or retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child forthwith.”
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520REP002919295
20 mai 1998
, it was incumbent on the mother to ensure that these contacts between father and child took place.
civ2
60794c2b9ba5988459c44e1e
27 février 1989
Geneviève Y... fait grief au jugement attaqué (tribunal d'instance de Marvejols, 24 janvier 1989) d'avoir rejeté son recours contre la décision de la commission administrative de la commune de Saint-Chély-d'Apcher
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0712JUD003974102
12 juillet 2007
– to have their child returned. 30.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0318DEC006182700
18 mars 2003
The parents owe the child a duty to give or withhold consent in the best interests of the child and without regard to their own interests.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC001485803
14 décembre 2004
In September 2000, the mother gave birth to a stillborn child, G.