CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0213JUD005140919
13 février 2025
Merits The parties’ submissions 27 . As she had done before the domestic courts, the applicant focused her Article 8 complaint on the purported unlawfulness of the interference.
Page 100 sur 145
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC002997506
6 décembre 2011
failed to obtain important evidence such as the [company’s] articles of association, its statute and the court decision, from which it could have found out who to summon to the hearing and the exact address
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD002157508
17 janvier 2017
Accordingly, it must be joined to the merits. 51.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0908JUD003589816
8 septembre 2022
She changed her name and address in order to prevent her father from being able to find and hurt her once he came out of prison.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0506JUD004830221
6 mai 2025
Merits The parties’ submissions (a) The applicant 28.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD002705805
4 décembre 2008
12 décembre 1989, une circulaire du ministre de l’Education nationale, intitulée « Laïcité, port de signe religieux par les élèves et caractère obligatoire des enseignements », a été adressée
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD003164504
4 ème Chambre
DTA_2204270_20241122
22 novembre 2024
pour un montant de 363 624,34 euros en vue du recouvrement des pénalités de retard dans le cadre de l'exécution du marché n°2018-15 conclu le 18 juin 2018 et portant sur la vidéosurveillance du site de Mercy
DTA_2302195_20241122
DTA_2201086_20241122
DTA_2202440_20241122
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917DEC001383205
17 septembre 2009
The Administration of Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) Law 33/1964 was enacted in order to address a situation of emergency and to set up the necessary judicial machinery for the continued administration
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC006261700
7 mars 2006
The Government have not therefore established that a remedy in contract was more than merely theoretical.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0311JUD003564097
11 mars 2003
The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0218JUD002893495
18 février 1999
The Court heard addresses by Mr Herndl, Mr Laule, Mr W.J. Habscheid and Mrs Voelskow-Thies. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0131JUD000389604
31 janvier 2008
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621DEC004996411
21 juin 2016
This implies that he was at fault in circumstances where he merely sought a declaration from the Federal Court of Nigeria upon the lawfulness of what had occurred.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905DEC000018114
5 septembre 2017
Such a statement would enable the solicitor to address the Society’s concerns in a focused response.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0910DEC003277996
10 septembre 1997
The prosecution informed the Court of Appeal that the address of the witness Barbottin had not yet been verified by the French authorities, but that permission had been obtained for a hearing in France
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0624JUD001455689
24 juin 1993
The Court heard addresses by Mr Kondolaimos for the Government, Mr Loucaides for the Commission and Mr Vitalis and Mr Stamoulis for the applicants, as well as their replies to its questions.