CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0227JUD003112711
27 février 2020
Radiation du rôle (Article 37-1-c - Poursuite de l'examen non justifiée)
Page 10 sur 16591
comm
6137232ecd580146774067b7
13 octobre 1998
le contrat de bail portant sur les locaux dans lesquels celle-ci exploitait son fonds de commerce ; que le liquidateur n'ayant pas répondu à cette mise en demeure dans le délai d'un mois prévu par l'article
61372369cd58014677409655
8 février 2000
anonyme, dont le siège est ..., défenderesse à la cassation ; La demanderesse invoque, à l'appui de son pourvoi, le moyen unique de cassation annexé au présent arrêt ; LA COUR, composée selon l'article
61372292cd580146773fe9b6
19 décembre 1995
de location des bungalows avaient été poursuivis postérieurement à l'ouverture de la procédure collective, n'a pas tiré de ses constatations les conséquences légales qui en découlaient au regard de l'article
1ère Chambre Civile
6a10c69bcdc6046d479dd505
22 mai 2026
-Condamner Mme [K] à lui payer la somme de 2000 euros en application de l’article 37-2 de la loi 91-467 du 10/07/1991.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD000450306
29 mai 2012
The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD004153813
29 juin 2021
The Government further submitted that the matter had been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention and the further examination of the case was no longer justified.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0426JUD002049307
26 avril 2012
It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD005975213
14 décembre 2017
its Protocols does not require it to continue the examination of the applications under Article 37 § 1 in fine . 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018JUD004232209
18 octobre 2016
The parties agreed that the said sum would be free of any taxes and would be payable within three months from the date of the notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD003963508
The Government further submitted that the matter had been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention and that the further examination of the case was no longer justified
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0327JUD003213311
27 mars 2014
terms, the Court finds this agreement equitable within the meaning of Rule 75 § 4 of the Rules of Court and that it is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0722JUD005516711
22 juillet 2014
It further finds that it is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention and Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court). 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD001728508
4 octobre 2016
The said sum will be free of any taxes and will be payable within three months from the date of the notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD004292708
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526JUD006295400
26 mai 2009
The Government further requested the Court to strike out the application in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention. The declaration provided as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD000794205
9 janvier 2018
In the light of the above, the Court considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention and that respect for human rights as defined in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0716JUD000165916
16 juillet 2020
The Court further notes that Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, in its relevant part, reads: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0116JUD007011613
16 janvier 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0612JUD005313809
12 juin 2018
terms, the Court finds the agreement equitable within the meaning of Rule 75 § 4 of the Rules of Court and that it is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article