CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

198 résultats pour « Pascal WILHELM »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0127JUD002426716

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2026

27 janvier 2026

Her title to that parcel was registered in the Immovable Property Register. First set of proceedings 3.

Source officielle

Page 10 sur 10

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC007274901

Admin. suprême

1 février 2005

1 février 2005

The applicant received RUR   2,766 of this sum, the rest being withheld by the bailiffs as an enforcement fee. The court decision ordering Ms K. to remove the garage remained unexecuted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD001527116

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

criminal sanction for discrimination, without relevant and sufficient reasons • Call to boycott protected by Article   10 as means of expression of opinion by way of protest • Differences from Willem

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0610JUD000155504

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2010

10 juin 2010

They complained that on several occasions the applicant had not been given any food during the entire day and that sometimes the warders withheld food parcels brought by the applicant's wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114REP002396294

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1998

14 janvier 1998

  On 16 July 1991 the applicant concluded a sales contract for a parcel of land situated in Kirchdorf.     17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1003JUD002947795

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2000

3 octobre 2000

If approval was withheld, the acquisition was null and void (section 16(1)). 15.     On 1 January 1994 a new Real Property Transactions Act (dated 1993) came into force.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024DEC004000804

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2006

24 octobre 2006

They depended on food parcels sent by their relatives. The supply of drinking water was limited.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0611JUD002025512

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2013

11 juin 2013

    Moreover, he submitted that an employee of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had obstructed the enforcement proceedings in that she had unlawfully withheld the child’s passport and had not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD000853206

Admin. suprême

3 février 2011

3 février 2011

sleeping place in the dormitory had been next to Yevgeniy Geppa's and that he had not seen any injuries on him or heard any complaints about the use of force against him; – an officer of the visits and parcels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1031JUD002276708

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2017

31 octobre 2017

The prosecutor’s orders read as follows: “... a man brought a parcel with suspicious contents which were of interest to investigators ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD006616613

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2015

21 juillet 2015

The parcel contained the applicant’s identity card and military service certificate in Arabic. Their translation was requested and on 24 May 2013 it was received. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928JUD003358314

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

According to her, R. seemed fine when she last saw him on 23 August 2013 and when she brought him a parcel on 31 October 2013 she was told that he was well. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1123JUD003774708

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2017

23 novembre 2017

As for food, his family had not been allowed to send him food parcels, and he had not had money to purchase additional products in the prison shop. As a result, he had often been left hungry.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217JUD006621710

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2019

17 décembre 2019

    All the documents that he had with him, including copies from his case file, were allegedly withheld by the guards. 68.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1128DEC002182593

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1995

28 novembre 1995

       In support of these allegations the applicant relies, inter alia, on evidence that letters and parcels have been opened and re-sealed, on a series of unexplained noises

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001053383

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 1992

24 septembre 1992

Letters which are likely to prejudice the purpose of the detention are to be withheld, unless provided otherwise by sections 88 and 90 (4) of the Law on Enforcement of Sentences, relating to written correspondence

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1022JUD000879079

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1984

22 octobre 1984

hearing, the rapporteur presented the facts and read out the expert opinions and observations received during the course of the investigation; the latter concerned, inter alia, the percentage of the parcels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325JUD003871816

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

However, the parcels which the applicant had received from her relatives had contained products not recommended by that diet (meat, smoked bacon and sausage) and cigarettes.

Source officielle